Closed
Bug 523324
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Fallback update cannot be downloaded for 3.5.4 build 1
Categories
(Toolkit :: Application Update, defect)
Toolkit
Application Update
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
45.63 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091007 Firefox/3.5.4 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) ID:20091007001339
When users have installed the build 1 of Firefox 3.5.4 the fallback update cannot be downloaded. Under such a condition the disabled license pane of the update wizard is shown and there is no way to continue the download process. See the attached screenshot.
The fallback update should work for users running a build 1 on Windows. Testing on Linux doesn't expose this problem. Is that update channel related?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
That happens on all platforms. Mozmill was lying to me because we are still able to click on hidden elements. That's really something we should have to fix.
By running the normal process of a fallback updates I see the same on OS X.
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
This is WONTFIX, sorry.
We're specifically only providing complete updates for the build1->build3 scenario. The fallback would be the same MAR file again, and if it's missing on the first pass, we don't gain anything by trying again.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
That's a bit unclear why you have wontfixed this bug. We are doing those tests for a long time now and fallback updated for complete mar's for build1->build3 are not different from the ones for e.g. 3.5->3.5.4. While the latter one is working perfect we fail in the build1->build3 case.
Can you please explain why this should be different?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
As Henrik says, we do fallback in complete updates all the time. The fallback for a complete update is to attempt the complete update again. I assume that is the way it is configured on the server generally so I would guess that this is just a configuration problem this time and the server isn't set up to send the complete mar file as the fallback as it normally does.
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> That's a bit unclear why you have wontfixed this bug. We are doing those tests
> for a long time now and fallback updated for complete mar's for build1->build3
> are not different from the ones for e.g. 3.5->3.5.4. While the latter one is
> working perfect we fail in the build1->build3 case.
>
> Can you please explain why this should be different?
Because the process we have for generating snippets between candidate builds does not include copying partials.
Given that:
* The "partial" and complete snippets would be exactly the same
* The beta channel for 3.5.x is a small subset of our users
* It's rare anyone would need to fallback when the first MAR they try is the complete
and
* If the first attempt _does_ fail, they can re-try with 'check for updates'
I see no reason to change this.
(In reply to comment #4)
> As Henrik says, we do fallback in complete updates all the time. The fallback
> for a complete update is to attempt the complete update again. I assume that is
> the way it is configured on the server generally so I would guess that this is
> just a configuration problem this time and the server isn't set up to send the
> complete mar file as the fallback as it normally does.
It's not configuration in the "flip a switch" sense of the word. Changing this involves finnicky modifications to an already finnicky process.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•