Closed
Bug 523499
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Changing add-on listing type
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Developer Pages, defect, P1)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
5.3
People
(Reporter: fligtar, Assigned: wenzel)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
73.45 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
9.91 KB,
patch
|
clouserw
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Add-ons can be changed between hosted and listed status, but not without a process:
If the add-on is currently hosted and wants to become listed-only:
* using the Change Status page, the user chooses this option and is presented with a confirmation page that explains the following
* all existing versions and files will be deleted, but please try to keep approval/review history
* contributions will be turned off
* access to the statistics dashboard will be lost
* all fields that listed add-ons do not have access to will be cleared (EULA)
If the add-on is currently listed and wants to become hosted:
* using the Change Status page, the user chooses this option and is presented with a confirmation page. The user must then accept the Developer Agreement.
* access to all of the hosted pages is enabled, and the add-on is moved to "Incomplete" status
* the user is directed to the New Version page where they may upload the first file for their add-on and continue that process as normal
Copy and layout for the confirmation pages and Change Status changes will be forthcoming.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Here's a mockup of the Change Status page.
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=408144) [details]
> mockup
>
> Here's a mockup of the Change Status page.
Thanks Fligtar. One change on the second one, "Mozilla-hosted add-ons must upload their add-ons..." doesn't sound right.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Yeah, let's change that part to:
Mozilla-hosted add-ons must be reviewed by an editor before...
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Here, try this.
Do we need a new confirmation page / message for this where we explain what the user *should* do? When changing to "listed" for example, the "fake" version won't magically acquire compatibility information, the user *should* add it though. Likewise, they'll need to set their homepage field if they haven't done that already.
On the other hand, we might not want to over-complicate it and leave it as-is. If the user wants their add-on to be found on the site, they'll probably add compatibility information. Opinions?
Attachment #409701 -
Flags: review?(clouserw)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 409701 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch, rev. 1
Please add a check for add-on type. I shouldn't be able to make a search engine self hosted.
Attachment #409701 -
Flags: review?(clouserw) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 409701 [details] [diff] [review])
r54853
> Please add a check for add-on type. I shouldn't be able to make a search
> engine self hosted.
Good catch, thanks! r54855
I'm marking this fixed for now, as it is feature-complete. Please reopen if anything is missing.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Thanks Fred. You raised some good points and I'll file separate bugs after a little experimentation.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: push-needed
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•