m-c fix in bug 514665 resolved this case in the opposite way than the others. c-c fix(es) in bug 514665 didn't notice and fixed it the wrong (= same as the others) way :-(
Created attachment 407932 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Package the right file This doesn't affect SM 2.0 packaging result, but I prefer to fix the code anyway. Just apply the same patch to trunk and branch for now.
Comment on attachment 407932 [details] [diff] [review] (Av1) Package the right file 1) As long as nothing is really broken there, don't touch comm-1.9.1 2) Don't introduce any new MOZILLA_1_9_1_BRANCH anywhere, we don't need those any more after being branched (if it needs branch landing, do different trunk and branch patches)
Comment on attachment 408110 [details] [diff] [review] (Av2) Package the right file [Checkin: Comment 4] http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/c183fee9b77a
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1256337993.1256340550.28842.gz&fulltext=1 WINNT 5.2 comm-central-trunk build on 2009/10/23 15:46:33 V.Fixed.