Closed
Bug 524522
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Tinderbox debug build unit tests don't capture a stack trace for JS_ASSERT assertion failure
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jorendorff, Assigned: jorendorff)
Details
(Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.05 KB,
patch
|
mrbkap
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
A JS_ASSERT failure does asm("int $3"), which raises SIGTRAP, which breakpad doesn't consider a report-worthy crash. The reason we do this is bug 308395. It's hard to get a program to continue running in GDB once abort() has been called. I propose calling raise(SIGABRT) instead of "int $3" or abort(). This will cause breakpad to engage, but unlike abort() it's resumable: Assertion failure: "oops" == "ugh", at ../jstracer.cpp:9250 Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xb7fe1430 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) signal 0 Continuing with no signal. js>
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Removing OS2 cruft as I don't think OS2 folks are debugging JS assertions much these days. Still needs testing on Mac, hang on.
Assignee: general → jorendorff
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Works fine on Mac. Let's do this on all platforms except Windows. This would be the right thing to do on Windows too (<signal.h> and raise are supported there), but I'm not sure it would work. Bug 345118 comment 0 says that a comment in the CRT source code says it wouldn't work; the MSDN documentation for raise() seems to say it would. Windows users, feel free to try it.
Attachment #408444 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #408451 -
Flags: review?(mrbkap)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
I assume on Windows you'd want DebugBreak for the debugger, but I don't know what that does to Breakpad: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679297%28VS.85%29.aspx
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Oh, apparently Breakpad can handle them, but you have to explicitly ask for it, precisely so it doesn't interfere with your debugger: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/crashreporter/google-breakpad/src/client/windows/handler/exception_handler.cc#408
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #408451 -
Flags: review?(mrbkap) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
I pushed this change directly to m-c. http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cf193e9f7eaa This is debug-only but I think we probably want it in 1.9.2 anyway after a little baking.
Flags: wanted1.9.2?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Ted, how should I test this? I tried building a browser with --enable-crashreporter and a manually added bogus JS_ASSERT, and ran it locally with MOZ_CRASHREPORTER=1 in my environment, but the crash reporter didn't engage.
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
That should be sufficient. If you'd like a more formal test, I have unit tests in attachment 400154 [details] [diff] [review] that actually test our exception handler. You could replace the guts of nsTestCrasher::Crash(), and then run make && make check in toolkit/crashreporter/test.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Per comment 6 and some discussion with Ted on IRC, I think this still isn't fixed on Mac, where breakpad does not respond to signals (!). The solution, I think, is to write to NULL, on Mac only, before calling raise(SIGABRT).
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Pushed the change suggested in comment 8 paragraph 2 to m-c: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/eba15b3faf31
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.2?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Summary: Tinderbox debug build unit tests don't capture a stack for JS_ASSERT assertion failure → Tinderbox debug build unit tests don't capture a stack trace for JS_ASSERT assertion failure
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
These bugs are all part of a search I made for js bugs that are getting lost in transit: http://tinyurl.com/jsDeadEndBugs They all have a review+'ed, non-obsoleted patch and are not marked fixed-in-tracemonkey or checkin-needed but have not seen any activity in 300 days. Some of these got lost simply because the assignee/patch provider never requested a checkin, or just because they were forgotten about.
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
This landed, jorendorff just forgot to update the status.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: fixed-in-tracemonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•