Closed
Bug 53017
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Editor does not regain focus after dialog is dismissed.(Linux)
Categories
(Core :: XUL, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jrgmorrison, Assigned: blizzard)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-][PDTP2][rtm need info])
Overview Description: This is a follow-on from bug 49975, but specifically for linux. If you bring up a dialog (e.g. Table, Link, ...) and dismiss it focus is not returned to the document. Without focus in the document, you cannot relaunch any of the six right-most dialogs. Workaround is to manually reset focus in the document after you dismiss a dialog. Steps to Reproduce: 1) Start Composer. 2) Enter some text. 3) Bring up one of the Dialogs (e.g., Image) 4) Cancel out of that dialog. 5) Try to enter text in the document. 6) Try to bring up the dialog. Actual Results: Can't enter text or launch dialog, until you set focus in the document again with the mouse. Expected Results: Focus automagically returns to the document when the dialog goes away. Reproducibility: 100% on linux Build Date & Platform Bug Found: netscape build 2000091721 linux rh6.1 DOES NOT OCCUR mozilla build 2000091505 win2k netscape build 2000091520 mac os9.0 This was a nsbeta3+ bug in it's previous form. Adding in the nomination.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
nsbeta3+, p2 for M18. Apparent loss of most editor functionality.
Priority: P3 → P2
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+]
Target Milestone: --- → M18
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
My linux build still exits to shell when I bring up a dialog...
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
All of the dialogs exit to shell on a fresh build from tonight.
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Seems like the workaround is to click in the window to return focus to it. That makes this not a P2. Setting PDTP3.
Priority: P2 → P3
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+] → [nsbeta3+][pdtp3]
Target Milestone: M18 → Future
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Removing PDTP3 for retriage. P2 category states: "High profile functionality, Obscure work around exists" This is certainly very high profile, since all editor functions silently fail. The workaround may be obvious to developers, but I think most people would consider it obscure, if they ever found it, especially those who stick to the keyboard interface (remember, this is an editor).
Priority: P3 → P2
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+][pdtp3] → [nsbeta3+]
Target Milestone: Future → M18
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
pdt claims that clicking is easily discovered. Please come to the pdt in person for any further discussion. pdtp3.
Priority: P2 → P3
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+] → [nsbeta3+][pdtp3]
Target Milestone: M18 → Future
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
nsbeta3-, nominate for rtm
Keywords: rtm
Summary: editor does not regain focus after dialog is dismissed.(Linux) → Editor does not regain focus after dialog is dismissed.(Linux)
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+][pdtp3] → [nsbeta3-][pdtp3]
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
I think I get it, and can a=brendan@mozilla.org in lieu of blizzard, who is traveling back east. He'll beat me up if I've approved wrongly, but it looks ok (great galloping global thread-unsafe state variables, batman!). /be
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
Testing with 09_20_08 build on Linux. Let's say I want to insert an 'image' and instead, in error, I click on 'link', I cancel out of the dialog box and go right back to the 'Insert' menu item. I click on 'Insert' and it gives me the dropdown menu so I assume I can select another item. I click on 'image' - nothing happens. In this instance, it is not intuitive that I should have gone back and clicked in the document.
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
let me give another example for you to ponder: 1. go to the additional comments section of this bug and enter some text 2. select Edit|Preferences (just so a dialog comes up), hit cancel 3. go back to the additional comments section, (do not use your mouse) the cursor is flashing at the insertion point 4. so continue to type -- does anything happen? as a novice user -- how would I know that I have to reselect the insertion spot? Especially if the cursor is flashing at me? Peter, I am removing the status whiteboard content so this can be reconsidered by you and pdt
Priority: P3 → P1
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-][pdtp3]
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Thanks Beth. :-) I was hoping you'd have a chance to add your thoughts. PDT, please consider also that Chris had already developed a good fix before this bug was downgraded, and it has passed a super-review.
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
I'd go P2 on this bug, but not P1. Marking as such.
Priority: P1 → P2
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+][PDTP2]
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
Excellent... fixed.
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
setting fixed this time...
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
reassigning to blizzard as per his request.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 54215 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
Not holding PR3 for this one, but should fix for RTM -- already has rtm keyword
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3+][PDTP2] → [nsbeta3-][PDTP2]
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
PDT marking [rtm need info] since patch and code reviews are not yet available.
Whiteboard: [nsbeta3-][PDTP2][rtm+] → [nsbeta3-][PDTP2][rtm need info]
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
This is now certainly dead in the water (no comments for 22 days now!), and should be moved off of the rtm radar.
Reporter | ||
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
Well, I should have stayed on top of this, but I didn't. ... but, mystery-fix, this is working for me with 2000102408 MN6 branch Linux Marking WORKSFORME. qa->sujay to verify.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 23 years ago
QA Contact: jrgm → sujay
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•