Closed
Bug 543517
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
[Tracking Bug] Move ~40 minis from MPT to 650castro
Categories
(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations: Projects, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: joduinn, Assigned: phong)
Details
We need to reduce the space in MPT by 1st March 2010. This will mean moving ~40minis out of MPT. For now the only place they can go is into 650castro. This bug is to track which machines need to be moved, installing shelves, tweaking configs, etc.
We may be able to avoid a downtime, depending on which machines are being moved, and how long they will be offline, but still TBD.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
mrz/oremj: what specific minis did you need moved? Can you list their names here, so we can start planning on our side?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> mrz/oremj: what specific minis did you need moved? Can you list their names
> here, so we can start planning on our side?
Jeremy, can you give me the list of machines which are in rack:
103.01
103.02
103.05
I dont have access to this in inventory, and according to Phong, these are the racks that need to be emptied.
Once we have the machine names, please assign back, so RelEng can figure out a transition plan. Hopefully we can move a few at a time, without any downtimes, but it depends on what machines are involved.
Assignee: nobody → jeremy.orem+bugs
Component: Release Engineering → Server Operations
QA Contact: release → mrz
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee: jeremy.orem+bugs → joduinn
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> https://public.inventory.mozilla.org/systems/racks/
Cool, thanks Jeremy.
RelEng machines to be moved, listed by rack:
talos-rev2-linux15
try-mac-slave10
try-mac-slave11
try-mac-slave12
try-mac-slave13
try-mac-slave14
try-mac-slave15
try-mac-slave16
try-mac-slave17
try-mac-slave18
try-mac-slave19
qm-pxp-try05
qm-pxp-try06
qm-pubuntu-try07
talos-rev2-linux14
talos-rev2-vista15
qm-pubuntu-try09
talos-rev2-vista13
moz2-darwin9-slave18
moz2-darwin9-slave17
moz2-darwin9-slave11
moz2-darwin9-slave12
moz2-darwin9-slave13
moz2-darwin9-slave14
moz2-darwin9-slave15
moz2-darwin9-slave16
qm-pubuntu-try08
bm-xserve21
fx-mac-1.9-slave2
bm-xserve11
bm-xserve12
bm-xserve20
qm-pubuntu-try05
qm-pubuntu-try06
qm-pvista-try05
qm-pvista-try06
qm-pleopard-try05
qm-pleopard-try06
moz2-darwin9-slave10
moz2-darwin9-slave09
qm-pvista-try10
qm-pvista-try11
qm-pxp-try08
qm-pleopard-try08
qm-pleopard-try09
qm-pleopard-try10
qm-pleopard-try11
qm-pubuntu-try10
bm-mini-build-ref
qm-pubuntu-try11
talos-rev2-leopard08
talos-rev2-leopard09
talos-rev1-leopard02.mv
qm-rhel03
qm-pmac01
qm-pmac02
moz2-darwin9-slave23
try-mac-slave09
talos-rev1-win701
qm-mini-centos01
qm-mini-centos02
qm-vmware02
talos-rev1-xp02.mv
talos-rev1-vista02.mv
moz2-darwin9-slave21
talos-rev1-xp01.mv
moz2-darwin9-slave24
moz2-darwin9-slave25
try-mac-slave08
moz2-darwin9-slave26
talos-rev2-xp21
qm-pxp-try07
talos-rev2-linux17
qm-stage-w2k3-01
SPARE-bm-stage-osx-01
talos-rev1-vista01.mv
moz2-darwin9-slave19
moz2-darwin9-slave20
try-mac-slave07
talos-rev1-leopard01.mv
moz2-darwin9-slave22
try-mac-slave06
talos-rev1-linux05
When possible, I'll coord with IT to bring back a few every time they visit MPT. Done gradually like that, we should be able to avoid downtimes, I believe.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Phong: is there shelving ready for these minis in 650castro?
Once there is shelving, we can coord taking down some of these with each MPT colo visit.
Assignee: joduinn → phong
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
ps: I cant set the "colo-trip" flag, but this bug does need "colo-trip"!
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
The shelving is (In reply to comment #5)
> Phong: is there shelving ready for these minis in 650castro?
>
> Once there is shelving, we can coord taking down some of these with each MPT
> colo visit.
The minis at MPT are sitting on shelves that will also relocate to 650.
John - there's no reason to start scheduling this right now. CoreSite hasn't gotten their act together and the clock hasn't even begun. If Layer42 works out I'd rather move them there first than to 650 and then Layer42.
Can we hold on this until we have more data?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Component: Server Operations → Server Operations: Projects
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7)
> The shelving is (In reply to comment #5)
> > Phong: is there shelving ready for these minis in 650castro?
> >
> > Once there is shelving, we can coord taking down some of these with each MPT
> > colo visit.
>
> The minis at MPT are sitting on shelves that will also relocate to 650.
>
> John - there's no reason to start scheduling this right now. CoreSite hasn't
> gotten their act together and the clock hasn't even begun. If Layer42 works
> out I'd rather move them there first than to 650 and then Layer42.
>
> Can we hold on this until we have more data?
Sure. I was worried about the deadline of 1st March in comment#0, but if thats changed, then I'm less concerned.
Just let me know when you have the revised deadline, and we'll work backwards from that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > The shelving is (In reply to comment #5)
> > > Phong: is there shelving ready for these minis in 650castro?
> > >
> > > Once there is shelving, we can coord taking down some of these with each MPT
> > > colo visit.
> >
> > The minis at MPT are sitting on shelves that will also relocate to 650.
> >
> > John - there's no reason to start scheduling this right now. CoreSite hasn't
> > gotten their act together and the clock hasn't even begun. If Layer42 works
> > out I'd rather move them there first than to 650 and then Layer42.
> >
> > Can we hold on this until we have more data?
>
> Sure. I was worried about the deadline of 1st March in comment#0, but if thats
> changed, then I'm less concerned.
>
> Just let me know when you have the revised deadline, and we'll work backwards
> from that.
Today is 1st March, so there goes the original deadline. Any revised date?
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Nope, none.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
This is probably invalid now since we've rebuilt a lot of these already. Do we still need this around?
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•