Closed
Bug 553162
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Memory footprint of Thunderbird is very high
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Backend, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: ittay.dror, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: perf, Whiteboard: [closeme 2011-03-15][has msgdb log])
Attachments
(1 file)
38.52 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.1.249.1030 Safari/532.5 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 I have both Thunderbird and Outlook 2007 running. Both have email and calendar accounts configured and I'm using both actively. I have several add-ons, but none of them looks like it should add memory overhead. Thunderbird takes 900MB with 600MB resident Outlook takes 515MB with 60MB resident I think thunderbird takes way too much memory. Please don't dismiss this bug with "please start thunderbird with a fresh profile". As a user, what I see is Thunderbird taking too much memory. Even if there's an extension to blame, I think it should be easy for users to find that extension. And, as stated, I don't think it is any extension. Reproducible: Always
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Hi Ittay. You won't need to create a new profile. But you will need to run through the steps at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Testing:Memory_Usage_Problems and report your results here. Please do not skip any steps.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
The profile is not on a network drive, there's no antivirus software and firewall is turned off. I do use gmail. How do I unsubscribe from "All Mail"? I will try the other steps later
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
> unsubscribe from "All Mail" Ittay, does http://email.about.com/od/gmailtips/qt/et_hide_in_imap.htm work for you? note also, the memory column you want to pay attention to in XP is "Mem Usage" (or Working Set in Vista)
Whiteboard: [needs results of Memory_Usage_Problems] → [needs reporter results of Memory_Usage_Problems]
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
didn't work for me (In reply to comment #3) > > unsubscribe from "All Mail" > > Ittay, does http://email.about.com/od/gmailtips/qt/et_hide_in_imap.htm work for > you? > > note also, the memory column you want to pay attention to in XP is "Mem Usage" > (or Working Set in Vista)
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
I followed the steps in the article: * Starting thunderbird, it uses 413M, 276M resident. hiding all mail and archiving mails in gmail made no difference (after restarting thunderbird) * safe mode dropped memory usage to 307M, 209M resident. I will look into my extensions, but 307M on startup is still way too high. * all other checks are negative. i did not try to log the db diagnostics (step 11), tell me if this is crucial (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Ittay. You won't need to create a new profile. But you will need to run > through the steps at > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Testing:Memory_Usage_Problems and report > your results here. Please do not skip any steps.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
it seems that every message touched increases memory. so that if i mark all messages in the trash folder and delete them, TB's memory increases by 200M. Same for 'remove duplicates'
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > I followed the steps in the article: > * Starting thunderbird, it uses 413M, 276M resident. hiding all mail and > archiving mails in gmail made no difference (after restarting thunderbird) > * safe mode dropped memory usage to 307M, 209M resident. I will look into my > extensions, but 307M on startup is still way too high. > * all other checks are negative. i did not try to log the db diagnostics (step > 11), tell me if this is crucial Suggest the following: 1. try 3.1 candidate build http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/3.1rc1-candidates/build2/unsigned/win32/en-US/ (you'll need to update lightning) 2. if candidate build doesn't substantially help, then do the msgdb log 3. list your extensions (100+MB sounds like a lot)
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I followed the steps in the article: > > * Starting thunderbird, it uses 413M, 276M resident. hiding all mail and > > archiving mails in gmail made no difference (after restarting thunderbird) > > * safe mode dropped memory usage to 307M, 209M resident. I will look into my > > extensions, but 307M on startup is still way too high. > > * all other checks are negative. i did not try to log the db diagnostics (step > > 11), tell me if this is crucial > > Suggest the following: > 1. try 3.1 candidate build > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/nightly/3.1rc1-candidates/build2/unsigned/win32/en-US/ > (you'll need to update lightning) no difference > 2. if candidate build doesn't substantially help, then do the msgdb log ok, next time i have some free time... > 3. list your extensions (100+MB sounds like a lot) compact header gmail conversation view lightening lookout nightly tester tools provider for google calendar remove duplicate messages (alternate) show inout
geez, what a convoluted system.... Anyway, I am on OSX 10.5.8 running TBird 3.0.5. After launch, memory usage climbed to 1gb in a matter of minutes... all available memory. Might have gone higher if I had more memory (2gb, Mac Pro Core Duo -- not core2 duo -- chip). Following instructions found on forum (Does problem resolve by disabling global indexing?) I turned off indexing, and YES the problem seems resolved. However, I upgraded to 3 to get better searching.... would love to have the bug fixed.... thanks
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
selander in comment #9 > would love to have the bug fixed ditto! selander, is version 3.1 better even with indexing enabled?
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
not wanting to break a working system, I have not upgraded to 3.1 I'll try the upgrade if it is supposed to have fixed this issue. Do you know if 3.1 addressed this problem? (In reply to comment #10) > selander in comment #9 > > would love to have the bug fixed > ditto! > > selander, is version 3.1 better even with indexing enabled?
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #11) > not wanting to break a working system, I have not upgraded to 3.1 I'll try the > upgrade if it is supposed to have fixed this issue. Do you know if 3.1 > addressed this problem? we don't have details about the circumstances/cause of your situation, so it is impossible to say whether it is definitely fixed in 3.1. The best anyone can say, is that version 3.1 does have several performance fixes that *might* help. And if it doesn't help, we will be in a better position to help diagnose your issue if you are on version 3.1. question: do you have any pop-based mail accounts?
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Ittay, I forgot to mention in my last comment, that you should measure results with thunderbird started in safe mode https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
Itta, if you don't get below 250MB with the following disabled gmail conversation view lightening lookout and lightning enabled, please provide msgdb log. thanks
Whiteboard: [needs reporter results of Memory_Usage_Problems] → closeme 2010-10-25
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
I disabled these and Thunderbird starts with 450M, of which 360M are resident. How do I send msgdb logs?
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
(where do i find the msgdb logs)
Comment 17•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > I disabled these and Thunderbird starts with 450M, of which 360M are resident. > > How do I send msgdb logs? start up thunderbird with msgdb:5 per https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging document the amount of memory being used, and the size of the folder you have open, shutdown, and then attach the log to the bug as a file at "Add an attachment".
Whiteboard: closeme 2010-10-25
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 483084 [details] msgdb log bienvenu, log shows 18 dbs open. (In reply to comment #18) > Created attachment 483084 [details] > msgdb log Ittay sez log was done with "3.1.4 I think. I am now in 3.1.6 and the footprint is still high (745M virtual, 485M resident). I didn't use the quick search during logging."
Attachment #483084 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Comment 20•14 years ago
|
||
actually 16
Component: General → Backend
Product: Thunderbird → MailNews Core
QA Contact: general → backend
Whiteboard: [has msgdb log]
Version: 3.0 → 1.9.2 Branch
Comment 21•13 years ago
|
||
Ittay, please install https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/9695/ in thunderbird and post a screen shot of View > ViewAbout > About:Memory
Comment 22•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #15) > I disabled these and Thunderbird starts with 450M, of which 360M are resident. Ittay, Please post memory usage operating version 3.1.7 for several minutes in *safe mode* - and not using any "Search all Messages". https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode 360M sounds high, but perhaps not horrible. Also, what's the disk size of the 3 largest files for your largest folders? \Mail\smart mailboxes\Archives.msf \Mail\smart mailboxes\Drafts.msf \Mail\smart mailboxes\Inbox.sbd\Unified.msf \Mail\smart mailboxes\Junk.msf \Mail\smart mailboxes\Trash.msf \ImapMail\imap.gmail.com\INBOX.msf - 46 hdrs in use \Mail\News & Blogs\Archives.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Archives.sbd\2009.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Archives.sbd\2010.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Articles.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Trash.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Trash.sbd\feeditems-1.rdf.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Java.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\People.msf \Mail\News & Blogs\Scala.msf
Whiteboard: [has msgdb log] → [closeme 2011-03-15][has msgdb log]
Comment 23•13 years ago
|
||
RESOLVED INCOMPLETE due to lack of response to previous question. If you feel this change was made in error, please respond to this bug with your reasons why.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•