Closed
Bug 554693
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Implement stub for indexedDB
Categories
(Core :: Storage: IndexedDB, defect)
Core
Storage: IndexedDB
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: sdwilsh, Assigned: sdwilsh)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
9.63 KB,
patch
|
mayhemer
:
review+
vlad
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This implements a stub for indexedDB. This is largely boilerplate stuff with a test. This adds zero functionality, however.
Attachment #434600 -
Flags: superreview?(vladimir)
Attachment #434600 -
Flags: review?(honzab.moz)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Blocks: async-IndexedDB
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needs review mayhemer][needs sr vlad]
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 434600 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 nsGlobalWindow::GetIndexedDB should fill the result with NULL. Shouldn't nsIIndexedDatabaseRequest be called nsIDOMIndexedDatabaseRequest to be consistent? We have DOM prefix on all interfaces (what is imho unnecessary).
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > (From update of attachment 434600 [details] [diff] [review]) > nsGlobalWindow::GetIndexedDB should fill the result with NULL. XPCOM rules say I shouldn't have to worry about that AFAIK, and I'm not sure it really matters since this won't land on mozilla-central until I actually implement it. I can do that if you want still though. > Shouldn't nsIIndexedDatabaseRequest be called nsIDOMIndexedDatabaseRequest to > be consistent? We have DOM prefix on all interfaces (what is imho > unnecessary). Yeah, I was torn as what to do. I thought DOM was only on the other ones because they are part of DOM storage, but maybe I was wrong. Should we see what sr says?
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 434600 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 OK then. I think that if vlad won't confirm my objects then we can go forward with this. If it would happen that you land this then I would still set the result of GetIndexedDB to null because you return NS_OK.
Attachment #434600 -
Flags: review?(honzab.moz) → review+
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needs review mayhemer][needs sr vlad] → [needs sr vlad]
Attachment #434600 -
Flags: superreview?(vladimir) → superreview+
Comment on attachment 434600 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 Let's go without DOM; it looks cleaner. We can always rename it later if we need to.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needs sr vlad]
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/users/sdwilsh_shawnwilsher.com/IndexedDB/rev/669f7ab62543
Whiteboard: [landed-idb]
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
This has changed, and we aren't going to be doing lots of small bugs anymore...
No longer blocks: async-IndexedDB, 555317
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Whiteboard: [landed-idb]
Component: DOM: Core & HTML → DOM: IndexedDB
Version: Trunk → unspecified
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•