Closed Bug 55699 Opened 24 years ago Closed 1 month ago

can't assert into remote http: datasource

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect, P3)

x86
Linux
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Future

People

(Reporter: myk, Unassigned)

References

Details

nsIRDFDataSource.Assert() fails on a remote datasource loaded via http:.  For
example, the following code returns "false":

myDataSource.Assert(myResource, myProperty, myValue, true);
itWorked = myDataSource.HasAssertion(myResource, myProperty, myValue, true);
alert(itWorked);

If the datasource is loaded via a file: URL, however, the code returns "true".

Build Date & Platform Bug Found: 2000-10-07-06 Linux
Yep, this isn't supported yet.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Is this perhaps a very small fix that has been bundled together with the
implementing of flush() for http: datasources so the modified RDF can be POSTed
back to an HTTP server?  There are situations where it's useful to be able to
modify some remote RDF without needing to save changes, so if it's just a matter
of enabling Assert() for these kinds of datasources, and it hasn't been enabled
because flush() wasn't working, don't wait for flush().

*** Bug 71855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Isn't this a prohibitive problem for people who consider to use Mozilla/XUL to
make a fronted for a client-server database?
s/fronted/frontend/ in my last comment (#4) -- by frontend I mean forms with
read/write access to live data on the server.
QA Contact: tever → nobody
IMHO, http datasources should only take assertions if they're writing them back
to the server.
Datasources are unique, so modifying the mozilla mirror of it introduces side
effects which are not reflected in other clients running on the same ds.
One can think of those side effects both as bug or as feature. If two windows
access the same datasource, do they want the original content or do they wanna
sneak information from one context to the other?
I personally like to think of it as bug.

Does anyone know of a xml-rpc or soap schema to implement remote rdf?
waterson left the building
Assignee: waterson → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
QA Contact: nobody → core.rdf
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 month ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.