Closed
Bug 55699
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 1 month ago
can't assert into remote http: datasource
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: RDF, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
Future
People
(Reporter: myk, Unassigned)
References
Details
nsIRDFDataSource.Assert() fails on a remote datasource loaded via http:. For example, the following code returns "false": myDataSource.Assert(myResource, myProperty, myValue, true); itWorked = myDataSource.HasAssertion(myResource, myProperty, myValue, true); alert(itWorked); If the datasource is loaded via a file: URL, however, the code returns "true". Build Date & Platform Bug Found: 2000-10-07-06 Linux
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Yep, this isn't supported yet.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Is this perhaps a very small fix that has been bundled together with the implementing of flush() for http: datasources so the modified RDF can be POSTed back to an HTTP server? There are situations where it's useful to be able to modify some remote RDF without needing to save changes, so if it's just a matter of enabling Assert() for these kinds of datasources, and it hasn't been enabled because flush() wasn't working, don't wait for flush().
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Isn't this a prohibitive problem for people who consider to use Mozilla/XUL to make a fronted for a client-server database?
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
s/fronted/frontend/ in my last comment (#4) -- by frontend I mean forms with read/write access to live data on the server.
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
IMHO, http datasources should only take assertions if they're writing them back to the server. Datasources are unique, so modifying the mozilla mirror of it introduces side effects which are not reflected in other clients running on the same ds. One can think of those side effects both as bug or as feature. If two windows access the same datasource, do they want the original content or do they wanna sneak information from one context to the other? I personally like to think of it as bug. Does anyone know of a xml-rpc or soap schema to implement remote rdf?
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
waterson left the building
Assignee: waterson → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
QA Contact: nobody → core.rdf
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•