Closed
Bug 559885
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Report on end-to-end time
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P4)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: catlee, Assigned: astoica)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [automation][reporting][q3goal])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
78.58 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
catlee
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Similar to how we have wait-time reports, we need end-to-end time reports for our various platforms and branches.
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [automation][reporting]
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [automation][reporting] → [automation][reporting][q2goal?]
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [automation][reporting][q2goal?] → [automation][reporting][q3goal]
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → astoica
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
e2e UI: - All reports main menu - Sort tables: e2e Times Report by Least when_timestamp, Build Run table by start_time - JSON for: e2e Times, Build run e2e Other: - changed all queries to return build requests with endtime <, and not <= - replace from sqlalchemy import * with actual imports - removed whitespaces - grouped general code in model.util.py Average Time per Builder Report: - Main report for all builders. Display: buildername, build type, job type, avg duration, no build request, % of successful/warnings/failed, min duration, max duration - Individual report for each builder: summary with everything above, plus all build requests that contributed to the result - running and pending jobs were excluded - the report is made for a timeframe, selectable through the date picker - JSON for: Agv time/builder, Builder details
Attachment #474739 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 474739 [details] [diff] [review] e2e json + other and Average Time per Builder Report >+class BuilderTypeReport(object): >+ >+ def __init__(self, buildername, starttime=None, endtime=None): >+ self.starttime = starttime >+ self.endtime = endtime >+ self.buildername = buildername >+ >+ self.platform = get_platform(buildername) >+ self.build_type = get_build_type(buildername) # opt / debug >+ self.job_type = get_job_type(buildername) # build / unittest / talos >+ >+ self.build_requests = [] >+ >+ self._d_min = NaN >+ self._d_max = 0 >+ self._d_sum = 0 >+ self._total_br_results = { >+ BuildRequest.no_result: 0, >+ BuildRequest.success: 0, >+ BuildRequest.warnings: 0, >+ BuildRequest.failure: 0, >+ BuildRequest.skipped: 0, >+ BuildRequest.exception: 0, >+ BuildRequest.retry: 0, >+ } This stuff is a bit weird. Maybe we can move these up into buildapi/model/util.py as top-level variables? (NO_RESULT, SUCCESS, ...) = range(-1, 6) > class BuildRequest(object): >- st_pending = 0 >- st_running = 1 >- st_complete = 2 >- st_cancelled = 3 >- st_interrupted = 4 >- st_misc = 5 >- >+ st_pending, st_running, st_complete, st_cancelled, st_interrupted, st_misc = range(6) Same here. >--- a/buildapi/model/util.py >+++ b/buildapi/model/util.py >@@ -1,9 +1,161 @@ >-import time >+import time, re >+ >+NaN = -1 NaN should be really not a number. None is handy to use.
Attachment #474739 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
previous patch updated to reflect Comment 2
Attachment #474739 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #475148 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #475148 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Attachment #475148 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #475148 -
Flags: checked-in+
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Anamaria finished this a while ago.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•