Closed
Bug 564174
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Split the SPARC compilation up between both build slaves
Categories
(Tamarin Graveyard :: Build Config, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Q3 11 - Serrano
People
(Reporter: brbaker, Assigned: jsudduth)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: build-speedup, buildbot)
We could trim 6 minutes off of the SPARC compilation time by splitting the compile phase up between both of the solaris-sparc build slaves. This will require a little more work than just juggling build config (will require local build-check and upload scripts). Second SPARC machine is slower, but moving a couple of compilation steps to it will be a net gain in reducing the SPARC compilation phase Build Step Current asteamsol4 asteamsol3 Difference Source_Clean 54 54 63 Source_Clone 126 126 118 Source_Update 1 1 1 BB_SLAVEUpdate 0 0 0 Compile_builtin.abc 31 31 38 Build_Release 188 244 Build_Release-wordcode 178 236 Build_Debug 208 208 Build_ReleaseDebugger 200 200 Build_DebugDebugger 225 225 Build_Check 0 0 0 Upload_ASTEAM 5 5 5 Upload_MOZILLA 54 54 21.17 15.07 11.75 6.10
Flags: flashplayer-triage+
Flags: flashplayer-qrb?
Updated•14 years ago
|
Summary: [buildbot] Split the SPARC compilation up between both build slaves → Split the SPARC compilation up between both build slaves
Whiteboard: build-speedup → build-speedup, buildbot
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jsudduth
Flags: flashplayer-qrb? → flashplayer-qrb+
Target Milestone: --- → flash10.2
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
This /might/ not be worth the work to split up. We used to have a time limit of 20 minutes for the compile phase and this is just over that mark. There are about another 3 build slaves that are in the 19-20 minute range so even doing this work will not be a huge win... not to say that shaving off a minute or so is not a win, just not huge like recent build time savings
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Should I go ahead and fix this in light of comment #2?
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
its a question of IF vs WHEN. IF: of course. we need to be striving to lower build times. (20 minutes now, 10 later, and so on). WHEN: Comment #2 implies there could be something more important to do before this. If so, sure, I have no opinion. If you press me for an opinion: unless there is a blocking issue, I'd just go for this now so we dont have to worry about it later.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Closing this bug since SPARC build/testing was optimized in bug #623609 Fixed via changeset 5802:c82ece99d8e0 and 5814:e270f9eeca30
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•