Closed Bug 566453 Opened 16 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Sufficiently large images treated as errors

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

All
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 567751

People

(Reporter: josh, Unassigned)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

In doing some data analysis, I needed to work with some images of size 6000x$BIGNUM. I've already reported bug 566273 about one issue handling large images. I also found that even larger images would not render at all, instead saying: The image "/path/to/image.png" cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. The Firefox title bar does show the correct image dimensions, 6000x317250 pixels. I've attached the 6000x317250 grayscale PNG in question. It should look like an all-black image with a single smooth curve in it.
OK, apparently not. "The file you are trying to attach is 2454 kilobytes (KB) in size. Non-patch attachments cannot be more than 2048 KB." Just *barely* too big. Attaching a 6000x200000 PNG instead, which still triggers the problem, and fits in the size limit.
Per Mike Hommey's suggestion in bug 566273, tested with --with-system-png removed; no difference.
Still present in 7.0a2.
Version: 1.9.2 Branch → Trunk
Out of curiosity, does any browser render this correctly? On my machine, Opera 11.50 gives a large white box saying "Image" in the upper-left, and Chromium 13.0.782.99 basically loads about:blank. (all white, no scrollbars)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: