Closed
Bug 566950
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
test-file.testRmdirNonempty fails on Windows
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Felipe, Assigned: adw)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
591 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I get the following error: error: TEST FAILED: test-file.testRmdirNonempty (failure) error: fail: rmdir on non-empty directory should raise error ("Component returned failure code: 0x80004005 (NS_ERROR_FAILURE) [nsILocalFile.remove]" doesn't match /^The directory is not empty: .+$/) It looks like nsILocalFile doesn't raise the right error on Windows? NS_ERROR_FAILURE instead of NS_ERROR_FILE_DIR_NOT_EMPTY
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Grr, thanks Felipe. Could you try this patch?
Assignee: nobody → adw
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
It works!
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 446306 [details] [diff] [review] patch Probably it would be safest for rmdir to ensure that the directory is actually empty rather than relying on Gecko to throw any exception at all. But, nsIFile.remove's comment says "The 'recursive' flag must be PR_TRUE to delete directories which are not empty" (it's false) [1], and I checked Gecko's various file implementations. The OS/2, OS X, and Unix implementations all use rmdir [2]. On POSIX systems it's an error to call rmdir on a nonempty directory. The Windows implementation [3] calls RemoveDirectoryW, which removes an empty directory [4]. What do you think Atul? [1]: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/io/nsIFile.idl#199 [2]: nsLocalFile*.cpp at http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/io/ [3]: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/io/nsLocalFileWin.cpp#1805 [4]: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa365488%28VS.85%29.aspx
Attachment #446306 -
Flags: review?(avarma)
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 446306 [details] [diff] [review] patch Uh, we have an OS/2 implementation of nsIFile? This looks fine to me. Only nit is that you might want to add a blurb within the catch clause that points to this bug for details on why we're not catching a specific exception. Thanks!
Attachment #446306 -
Flags: review?(avarma) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Thanks Atul. This adds the blurb.
Attachment #446306 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Myk, requesting permission to land, and also to block 0.4 final release on this. Without this fix, which is very small, the file unit test fails on Windows (7).
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
a=myk, as that test should pass on Windows, and this is a good, low-risk fix, although I wouldn't absolutely block on it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/labs/jetpack-sdk/rev/c9feffc46e02
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
The Add-on SDK is no longer a Mozilla Labs experiment and has become a big enough project to warrant its own Bugzilla product, so the "Add-on SDK" product has been created for it, and I am moving its bugs to that product. To filter bugmail related to this change, filter on the word "looptid".
Component: Jetpack SDK → General
Product: Mozilla Labs → Add-on SDK
QA Contact: jetpack-sdk → general
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•