|
1.46 KB,
application/x-zip
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100518 Minefield/3.7a5pre ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100518 Minefield/3.7a5pre ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) hi, I've tried the new css values of intrinsic sizing and they are a fantastic improvement in the box design, but i really do not understand why they are only relative to width and not for height too in flexbox orientation, for example, the improvement is only relative to horizontal oriented items as David Baron proposes, the values should be definitely accepted by height too http://dbaron.org/css/intrinsic/#new-width-values http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2007Nov/0119.html thank you for your time Reproducible: Always
|
||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
What would they mean for height?
hi David, i mean min-width:-moz-min-content; works min-height:-moz-min-content; does not -moz-*-content works only on [min|max]width
|
|
||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
I know that. I'm asking what you want them to do.
ok sorry, i've bad interpreted your message... i'm building right now a simple test where min-content & co are useful thank you
in the meanwhile i try to simplify my problem for submitting here, i ask you what do you have concluded about this... what I've read let me think that you have decided to propose min|max-content for height too... but now i think not... this values are not available for height for a valid reason... height:auto is equivalent to min-content but i think with one or more exceptions, in my case when display:block is used in conjunction with display:box i'm not sure if my test is valid and maybe there is a workaround, but i try to submit it here
Created attachment 446609 [details]
test min content
(run outer.htm)
i don't know what is the problem...
maybe the problem is
html{min-height:100%;} that is not working
if i can specify it instead of height:100%; probably it will works
now i think that is another problem and not relative to min-content
byeboris, on step 3 of the attachment here the border image follows the minimum width of the contained purple bordered box but in height not, there's no way to make the border image following content's height
min-height: 100% would work fine for you if you had a non-auto height on <html>, no?
I'm trying to set a border image on the body the border image should have as minimum size the client(iframe) minimum width and minimum height -- min-height:100%; height:auto; on <html> should work, but min-height:100% on documentelement is probably not computed
> but min-height:100% on documentelement is probably not computed
It is. But "height: auto" on the root means that a percentage height on the body will be ignored. Is there a reason you can't put your border-image on the <html>?
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
||
|
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
||
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
||
|
||
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
In vertical writing modes, the existing implementation for the width properties doesn't work (as it's really an implementation for inline-size). We should let it apply to height properties instead, but we don't parse these values there.
|
|
||
Comment 15•3 years ago
|
||
Fixing this involves fixing the callers of IsAutoBSize (which was tweaked in bug 1113216 to provide an auto/none/0-like behavior) to do the correct thing for thee values, which in some cases my involve propagating them on the nsHTMLReflowState.
|
|
||
Comment 16•2 years ago
|
||
See also IsNonAutoNonZeroBSize (helper used by nsBlockFrame::IsSelfEmpty), which received a similar tweak in bug 1126420.
|
||
Comment 18•3 months ago
|
||
Is there any progress here?
Description
•