Closed Bug 567088 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

Image Properties or "View Page Info"

Categories

(Firefox :: General, defect)

Product:
Firefox
Component:
General
Platform:
x86
Windows XP
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

People

(Reporter: lucianolllg, Unassigned)

Details

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3

In Firefox
 -------------
THE PROPERTIES OF IMAGE IS NOT EASY BEING ACCESSED
 -------------
############################################################

WHOM THE UTILITY OPENING A SECOND TIME OF AN IMAGE
 1MB ,2MB ,3MB .... 5MB ,10MB ,nMB ;
 FIRST TO EXTREMES THAT FORCE FOR PROCESSING.

VERY HEAVY OPEN AN IMAGE IS NOT A SECOND TIME UTIL
 ---------------

##############################################################

VISUALIZATION IN A FAST AND DETAILED
 ONE OR MORE IMAGES
 JA --- --- AND HAVE A PICTURE I WANT DATA ON THE SAME

still insist that it is not necessary to see the picture again!


######################################################


What actually NEED ---- what is VITAL

   ---------------------------
LOCATION

TYPE

DIMENSIONS

ASSOCIATED TEXT
  -------------------------





###############################################




If a page has 10 000 IMAGES

 NOT WISH THEY ALL OPEN DATA
 WANT JUST ONE, TWO, OR THREE ..... LOCAL IMAGES


d

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.When you view THE PROPERTIES OF AN IMAGE
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
1 . ONE SET OF EXCESSIVE AND ABUSE REPORTS OF ALL IMAGES OF A PAGE
2 . OPENING AN IMAGE OF GREAT LENGTH AND VERY HEAVY A SECOND TIME

Expected Results:  
1. NEED ACCURATE AND DETAILED REPORTS OF AN IMAGE ONLY every time I ask;
2. WITHOUT MAKING A DETAILED ANALYSIS ON OTHER IMAGES
3. A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF ALL IMAGES BELONGS TO SECTION ONE MORE OPTION MENU - SELECTION IN A SPECIAL (a separate button)

ABIR INFORME DETALHADO EM LINHAS NUM QUADRO APENAS EM TEXTO ;
1 PEQUENO 2 DETALHADO 3 QUE SEJA SELECIONADO O TEXTO TODO OU DE UM DETALHE 


IMPORTANT TO INFORM THE IMAGE INDICATIVE fast and easy and easy to navigate
 ---
 It SIMPLICITY OF SIGN SOPHISTICATED FORM
Essa nova forma de ver PROPRIEDADES DE IMAGEM torna confusa e abusivamente dispendioso o processo originalmente SIMPLES de ver as PROPRIEDADES de uma imagem. Qual? Qual a utilidade de analisar todas as imagens de uma página? apenas para saber a PROPRIEDADE DE UMA (1) SOMENTE. 

Atualmente na versao 3.6 do Firefox ; Veja;
 Ele analisa ; mostra; grafica e em modo texto; TODAS AS IMAGENS DA PAGINA;
 Veja; UMA PAGINA COM 10000 Imagens GIF e com 1000 imagens JPG;
 QUANDO APENAS UNICAMENTE E ESPECIFICAMENTE QUERO APENAS UMA (1), ou mesmo 2 ou 4; ANALISAR 10000 imagens eh "antinatural";


Apologies for using something old, but the term son, let me ...




Son: I want to know only ONE (1) IMAGE;
Son: I want to know TWO (2), OR FIVE (5) IMAGES;
Son: It is necessary to analyze the page and all;
Son: Much Less Play Graphically all, one by one;
Son: An image of 10 MB weighs in processing machine;
 Once is enough.

 ps; If someone call me Son beforehand; already ask you some excuse;
 and even blessing, but I feel the need to interject.

This new way of seeing PROPERTIES OF IMAGE becomes confused and misused
costly process originally SIMPLE PROPERTIES see a
image. What? Is it useful to review all the images on a page?
just to know the PROPERTY OF ONE (1) ONLY.

Currently in version 3.6 of Firefox, see;
 He analyzes, displays, graphics and text; ALL IMAGES FROM THE WEB SITE;
 See, A PAGE WITH 10 000 Images GIF and JPG images with 1000;
 ONLY WHEN SPECIFICALLY AND ONLY WANT ONLY ONE (1), or even two or
4; EXAMINE 10 000 pictures eh "unnatural";




Apologies for using something old, but the term son, let me ...




Son: I want to know only ONE (1) IMAGE;
Son: I want to know TWO (2), OR FIVE (5) IMAGES;
Son: It is necessary to analyze the page and all;
Son: Much Less Play Graphically all, one by one;
Son: An image of 10 MB weighs in processing machine;
 Once is enough.

 ps; If someone call me Son beforehand; already ask you some excuse;
 and even blessing, but I feel the need to interject.



##########
ps
Gente peço desculpas pela ma traduçao;
 sinseramente estou grato por alguma atençao de vossa parte.
Google Translate http://translate.google.com
sinceramente grato
with particular observation
 Firefox in version 3.6
 occurs
 conjunction of "Image Properties" to "View Page Info"


 Celebrities; shows the logic; clear, evident; property of an image refers to only one (1) image.
I have a page with 50 images, each with 10 MB;
 why open all again if just want to see one (1);
 a simple ............ Property of an image.
Only necessary; Practical; Rest for the processing;
 I miss the simple, otherwise I seek ...... View Page Info.

#########################
Location: https: / / developer.mozilla.org/skins/mozilla/Fox3/img/mdc-logo.png
Type: PNG Image
Size: 5.97 KB (6116 bytes)
Dimensions: 262px × 42px
Associated Text: Mozilla Developer Center
########################
where is the property of the image in Firefox 3.6?


so simple, so logical, so clear, so necessary
Summary: Image Properties → Image Properties or "View Page Info"
I think your looking for this add-on.
http://ted.mielczarek.org/code/mozilla/fxif/
Also, you would access items from comment 6 by right click image->View Image Info.

Properties have been removed from FF and now depends on bug 232806.
Element Properties :: Add-ons for Firefox
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14228/
I'm sorry, but this report is really unclear. Please try describing in detail (in a new bug) the steps one needs to follow to see the issue, what results you think one should get, and what results do you see instead.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Bug_writing_guidelines
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Yeah, right click properties was removed from the context menu, either use the addons or use page info.  I think it was removed because not enough use it and second it was incomplete anyway.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.