Status
()
People
(Reporter: Daniel Bratell, Assigned: Akkana Peck)
Tracking
({dataloss})
Firefox Tracking Flags
(Not tracked)
Details
(URL)
I tried to copy the code on http://codeguru.earthweb.com/internet/IsINetConnection.shtml and then pasting it in another application (Visual Studio's editor) but got some assertions during the paste saying "Mixing cached and not cached data" or something like that. The I noticed that the pastead text missed at least a couple of line breaks on lines starting with // (a C++ comment), making the code end up in a comment. I wonder if this can be caused by the NOXIF landing. A major bug it is anyway. I have no time to look at it myself, but I think it might be quite easy to fix. Might. This was with a build from CVS 2000-10-14 (I think. Might be 2000-10-15 or 2000-10-13) on Windows 2000.
|
(Reporter) | |
Updated•18 years ago
|
||
Keywords: dataloss
|
|
(Reporter) | |
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
This is on the trunk btw. I have not tested any branch build.
|
||
Updated•18 years ago
|
||
Summary: Data corrupted when copy'n'paste → Soem linebreaks missing when copy&paste
|
||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
moving out to future
Summary: Soem linebreaks missing when copy&paste → Some linebreaks missing when copy&paste
Target Milestone: --- → Future
|
(Assignee) | |
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Probably not related to bug 56561 -- I dont' see the "mixed wrapping and non-wrapping" asserts in that bug which Daniel reports in this one. I don't know what's going on in this one (haven't had a chance to look). Though the missing linebreaks might be solved by the fix for that bug (Daniel, if you get a chance to apply that patch, it would be great to know whether it helps).
|
|
(Reporter) | |
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
I looked at this in the debugger and the assertions appear right at the spot your patch touches. I'm building right now but I'm quite sure it's a dupe. I will mark it as such as soon as I've checked your patch.
|
|
(Reporter) | |
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
This was the same bug as bug 56561 and was fixed by the patch to it. I noticed another bug and opened bug 57047 for it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 56561 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•