Closed Bug 575638 Opened 15 years ago Closed 14 years ago

[e10s] clarify gChromeRegistry usage in nsChromeRegistry.cpp

Categories

(Core :: IPC, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
fennec - ---

People

(Reporter: dougt, Unassigned)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

>+++ b/chrome/src/nsChromeRegistry.cpp >+nsChromeRegistry::GetService() >.. >+ if (!nsChromeRegistry::gChromeRegistry) Why the qualifier? >+ NS_IF_ADDREF(gChromeRegistry); Can't be null there.
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
Attachment #459924 - Flags: review?(doug.turner)
Attachment #459924 - Flags: review?(doug.turner) → review+
tracking-fennec: --- → ?
would not block shipping fennec on this.
tracking-fennec: ? → 2.0-
Comment on attachment 459924 [details] [diff] [review] patch very low risk (if it compiles, it should be good to go) follow up bug on the e10s -> mc landing.
Attachment #459924 - Flags: approval2.0+
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: