Closed Bug 578987 Opened 16 years ago Closed 14 years ago

wiki.mozilla.org server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555

Categories

(Websites :: Other, defect)

x86
Windows Vista
defect
Not set
major

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 657920

People

(Reporter: alex_mayorga, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:2.0b2pre) Gecko/20100715 Minefield/4.0b2pre Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:2.0b2pre) Gecko/20100715 Minefield/4.0b2pre ID:20100715040517 When visiting https://wiki.mozilla.org the following message appears in the Error Console: "wiki.mozilla.org : server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555" Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to https://wiki.mozilla.org Actual Results: "wiki.mozilla.org : server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555" is written to the Error Console. Expected Results: Nothing is written to the error console. http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3555
Blocks: moz-rfc5746
Group: websites-security
IT bug filed to move wiki.mozilla.org behind the zeus
The problem I described on this bug is not reproducible anymore.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
And now it's broken again, along with most of our sites.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Ever confirmed: true
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Fwiw, https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/analyze.html?d=wiki.mozilla.org reports { Session resumption Yes Renegotiation Secure Renegotiation Supported } Yet, SeaMonkey 2.0.14 still reports { wiki.mozilla.org : server does not support RFC 5746, see CVE-2009-3555 } (Confusing :-/)
(In reply to comment #4) > > (Confusing :-/) It's because the servers have erratic behaviour. Sometimes they include, and sometimes they exclude the announcement for supporting the protocol.
Is this possibly a difference in IPv6/IPv4 configuration? There have been similar bugs recently.
I don't think this is a v6/v4 issue, as our SSL config is not different between them. However, I can verify that Firefox (and apparently Seamonkey) report RFC 5746 as not being supported, whereas ssllabs.com says it is supported. Our load balancers are set up to support it, so that's 2-against-1, things that say it's supported and things that say it's not (ssllabs.com + LB vs Gecko). I'm duping this to the main bug on that.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.