Closed Bug 584661 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago
failure in /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test
_xhr .html | Exited with code -1073741819 during test run (after GC-related JS _ASSERT)
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1280998917.1280999996.13985.gz .... 2729 INFO SimpleTest finished /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test_throwingOnerror.html in 1438ms 2730 INFO TEST-START | /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test_xhr.html ++DOMWINDOW == 15 (095957A0) [serial = 769] [outer = 06B5C998] Conservative GC scanner has missed the root 0DF454E0 with tag 4294967285 on the stack. Aborting. Assertion failure: false, at e:/builds/moz2_slave/mozilla-central-win32-debug/build/js/src/jsgc.cpp:2538 nsStringStats => mAllocCount: 414924 => mReallocCount: 29918 => mFreeCount: 378563 -- LEAKED 36361 !!! => mShareCount: 698265 => mAdoptCount: 46497 => mAdoptFreeCount: 46495 -- LEAKED 2 !!! NEXT ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test_xhr.html | Exited with code -1073741819 during test run INFO | automation.py | Application ran for: 0:09:45.188000 INFO | automation.py | Reading PID log: c:\docume~1\cltbld\locals~1\temp\tmpgw3fd7pidlog PROCESS-CRASH | /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test_xhr.html | application crashed (minidump found) Operating system: Windows NT 5.2.3790 Service Pack 2 CPU: x86 GenuineIntel family 6 model 15 stepping 8 1 CPU Crash reason: EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION Crash address: 0x0 Thread 0 (crashed) 0 mozjs.dll!JS_Assert [jsutil.cpp:52d5fe9352a6 : 74 + 0x0] eip = 0x006d8c8a esp = 0x0012d450 ebp = 0x0012d450 ebx = 0x00000000 esi = 0x01662588 edi = 0x00000000 eax = 0x00000000 ecx = 0x5f02154b edx = 0x00541d40 efl = 0x00010216 Found by: given as instruction pointer in context
Summary: GC-related JS_ASSERT in test_xhr.html | Exited with code -1073741819 during test run → failure in /tests/dom/src/threads/test/test_xhr.html | Exited with code -1073741819 during test run (after GC-related JS_ASSERT)
This is the GC rooting assertions, right?
(In reply to comment #5) > This is the GC rooting assertions, right? Currently the GC scans certain roots twice, once during the conservative scan of the stack and once when navigating over AutoRoots. That allows to verify that the conservative GC properly discovers roots before we remove the autoroots. But as this assert indicates at least on Windows something is wrong and some roots are missed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Duplicate of bug: 583598
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.