When running the performance runtests in index mode, results can be very small numbers (sometimes 1 and below). The conf95 function in runtestUtils will return a > 100% conf interval for small numbers. I'm not sure that this is correct. e.g: > conf95([1.01, .96, .98]) > 119.01475586404142 For larger values, the interval seems correct > conf95([101, 96, 98]) > 5.1877329360152133
Assignee: nobody → cpeyer
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → flash10.2
Upon looking at the code, the formula is correct. Marking invalid.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.