Closed
Bug 586190
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Mac Chatzilla manifest is different causing unify to fail, and mac builds to be red.
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)
SeaMonkey
Build Config
Tracking
(blocking-seamonkey2.1 a3+)
RESOLVED
FIXED
seamonkey2.1a3
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking-seamonkey2.1 | --- | a3+ |
People
(Reporter: Callek, Assigned: kairo)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.33 KB,
patch
|
neil
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The mac builds of SeaMonkey are failing due to chatzilla not building correctly on both arch's. I logged into our mac builder and diff'd the two files. [note that unify sorts the files first] --- objdir/ppc/mozilla/dist/seamonkey/SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-91 2d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome.manifest 2010-08-10 19:00:26.000000000 -0700 +++ objdir/i386/mozilla/dist/seamonkey/SeaMonkey.app/Contents/MacOS/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-9 12d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome.manifest 2010-08-10 19:00:36.000000000 -0700 @@ -5,22 +5,21 @@ contract @mozilla.org/network/protocol;1?name=irc {f21c35f4-1dd1-11b2-a503-9bf8a539ea39} overlay chrome://browser/content/browser.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/browserOverlay.xul application={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384} contract @mozilla.org/network/protocol;1?name=ircs {f21c35f4-1dd1-11b2-a503-9bf8a539ea39} overlay chrome://songbird/content/xul/layoutBaseOverlay.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/browserOverlay.xul application=songbird@songbirdnest.com component {38a95514-1dd2-11b2-97e7-9da958640f2c} components/chatzilla-service.js content chatzilla-sm jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/content/chatzilla/sm/ overlay chrome://communicator/content/pref/preferences.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/prefsOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} style chrome://global/content/customizeToolbar.xul chrome://chatzilla/skin/browserOverlay.css +overlay chrome://browser/content/browser.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/browserOverlay.xul application={a463f10c-3994-11da-9945-000d60ca027b} content chatzilla jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/content/chatzilla/ -content chatzilla-ff jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/content/chatzilla/ff/ overlay chrome://communicator/content/pref/pref-appearance.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/prefsOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} contract @mozilla.org/commandlinehandler/general-startup;1?type=chat {38a95514-1dd2-11b2-97e7-9da958640f2c} overlay chrome://editor/content/editorTasksOverlay.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/chatzillaOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} skin chatzilla modern/1.0 jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/skin/modern/chatzilla/ -manifest chrome/chatzilla.manifest -overlay chrome://browser/content/browser.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/browserOverlay.xul application={a463f10c-3994-11da-9945-000d60ca027b} +content chatzilla-ff jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/content/chatzilla/ff/ locale chatzilla en-US jar:chrome/chatzilla.jar!/locale/en-US/chatzilla/ overlay chrome://chatzilla/content/menus.xul chrome://communicator/content/tasksOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} category command-line-handler m-irc @mozilla.org/commandlinehandler/general-startup;1?type=chat style chrome://songbird/content/xul/layoutBaseOverlay.xul chrome://chatzilla/skin/browserOverlay.css overlay chrome://chatzilla/content/chatzilla.xul chrome://communicator/content/utilityOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} overlay chrome://navigator/content/navigator.xul chrome://chatzilla/content/browserOverlay.xul application={92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a} Which means that ONLY ppc is getting the |manifest chrome/chatzilla.manifest| line somehow, which looks inherently wrong anyway. I did not yet investigate more.
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking-seamonkey2.1: --- → ?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
It worked after a clobber once and then failed again, which smells funny.
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Sounds like a race condition between the various jar.mn files...
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
I think removing BOTH_MANIFESTS for the real extensions should do the trick. On a local L10n build, both the ChatZilla packages as well as the ChatZilla L10n pack look good on manifest inspection with this patch applied.
Attachment #465226 -
Flags: review?(neil)
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #465226 -
Flags: review?(neil) → review+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Markings as blocking as it's bustage.
blocking-seamonkey2.1: ? → a3+
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b4
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Pushed as http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/8aa03e83218c - waiting for builds to see if things clear up. Probably will need a few builds to verify as first we need to clean chatzilla on all slaves to get the line removed.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Urgh, I messed up the patch and Neil also didn't spot that I deleted those semicolons that still are needed. Fixed in http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/f9f4b09d470d
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
It looks very much like this fixed it, and that also means that this is not a ChatZilla bug after all but a SeaMonkey one.
Assignee: rginda → nobody
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Component: ChatZilla → Build Config
Product: Other Applications → SeaMonkey
QA Contact: chatzilla → build-config
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: mozilla2.0b4 → ---
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → kairo
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.1a3
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•14 years ago
|
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: x86 → All
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•