Closed
Bug 595523
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Respond to implications of storage of packed extensions (bug 533038) for Gecko 2
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Other Applications
DOM Inspector
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: crussell, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
By mwu's blog post, we should do one of two things: * use <em:unpack>true</em:unpack> This means we're responsible for the user experiencing slower cold startup. * Stop packing the chrome into a jar Compressed jars result in higher memory overhead. I don't think there's any reason to continue using jars if they're uncompressed. If we're not using <em:unpack>true</em:unpack>, though, apparently we lose the window icon.
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0) > * Stop packing the chrome into a jar > Compressed jars result in higher memory overhead. I don't think there's any > reason to continue using jars if they're uncompressed. If we're not using > <em:unpack>true</em:unpack>, though, apparently we lose the window icon. I don't think we use compressed jars (at least the build system doesn't to my knowledge). Non-compressed jars still can give you a win, but maybe not once add-ons are left in their xpi form.
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Since bug 646519 attachment 582609 [details] [diff] [review] landed, the extension is installed unpacked.
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Bulk close. This component is no longer supported or maintained. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499023
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Bulk close. This component is no longer supported or maintained. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1499023
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•