Closed Bug 598886 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago
Relicense HTML parser C++ files that are applicable outside Gecko
Per licensing@ discussion, change the license of HTML5 parser C++ files that'd be applicable outside Gecko to the same license as the rest of the reusable parser core, i.e. MIT.
Requesting review in reference to the licensing@ thread around June 23.
Assignee: nobody → hsivonen
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #477878 - Flags: review?(gerv)
Comment on attachment 477878 [details] [diff] [review] C++ file changes r=gerv, assuming you are the only contributor, or you have sought permission to relicense from any other contributors. Gerv
Attachment #477878 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
Comment on attachment 477879 [details] [diff] [review] Java file changes to generator code r=gerv, same caveat. Gerv
Attachment #477879 - Flags: review?(gerv) → review+
(In reply to comment #3) > r=gerv, assuming you are the only contributor, or you have sought permission to > relicense from any other contributors. I have sought (and gotten) permission from the sole contributor (Zbyszek Skowron) who I don't know to be a Mozilla Corporation contractor or employee (and whose single-line contribution I expect to overwrite soonish as part of fixing bug 502176). Ben Newman contributed code as an employee of Mozilla Corporation and was OK with this change. David Baron contributed indirectly and hasn't expressed an opinion, but I assumed you (Gerv) were authorized to approve relicensing given dbaron's employment. So all is OK here?
Yes, I'm authorized to approve relicensing of MoFo-copyrighted code (such as the contributions of employees and contractors), but would certainly pause in doing so if an employee objected. But, absent such objections, go right ahead :-) Gerv
Thanks. Landed: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a0cca0e817e8
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
It's fine with me, for what it's worth.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.