Closed
Bug 59925
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Win initially black, not body bgcolor when body background="img" in effect
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Future
People
(Reporter: david, Unassigned)
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
53.40 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details |
Current behavior:
There is something about the way the underlying HTML--probably the nested table
structure plus the cascading style sheet--interacts with the background image
that creates an ugly "windowshade" pulling down effect when the browser
initially renders the page. The HTML renders perfectly, but the redraw is really
ugly.
Specifically, even though the cascading style sheet specifies that the body tag
should always have a background color of "white", Mozilla initially clears the
window to "black", draws all text in their correct foreground colors on the
black background, and then redraws the entire page with the background graphic
"behind" the text. It's this initial drawing of the page with an incorrect
black background that creates the ugly "windowshade" effect.
Expected behavior:
As the page redraws progressively, it should initially clear the window to the
correct background color based on the attributes of the body tag and/or the
cascading style sheet.
There appears there may be some sort of performance issue here too. Even though
the background image is cached after the first page load, subsequent page loads
are redrawn just as slowly as the initial page load. Both IE and NN4 display
this page faster.
Reporter | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Summary: ugly black "windowshade" effect on redraw → Win initially black, not body bgcolor when body background="img" in effect
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
--> layout seeing on win98 2000111304. Not sure if this is a bug or not.
Assignee: asa → clayton
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → Layout
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Linux → All
QA Contact: doronr → petersen
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
I just verified that changing the <body bgcolor="white"... does not alter the
behavior. The site is currently relying on the .css file to specify the body
background color. It appears that Moz is clearing to black, no matter what the
<body bgcolor is or what the css spscifies if there is a background image specified.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
That test case gets rid of the cascading style sheet and just uses a <body
bgcolor="white" to illustrate the problem. It's a pretty simplefied test case.
The file uploaded is named testcase.zip.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Assignee: clayton → harishd
Please triage.
I can neither access the above URL nor the testcase. Marking bug INVALID until
the problems are resolved ;-)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
The testcase is a zip file. save it somewhere and use zip-info, stuffit, pkzip,
winzip, or whatever you like. rename it .jar and you can use unjar or mozilla.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
This bug has been marked "future" because the original netscape engineer working
on this is over-burdened. If you feel this is an error, that you or another
known resource will be working on this bug,or if it blocks your work in some way
-- please attach your concern to the bug for reconsideration -----
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → Future
Updated•23 years ago
|
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
This isn't and never has been a parser problem. To layout.
Assignee: harishd → other
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: Parser → Layout
QA Contact: petersen → ian
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
This creates a lot of "flicker" as windows & frames constantly reset to black
just before loading pages and gives an unprofessional feel to sites and to the
browser itself. I would like to see the target for this be better
than "Future".
I cannot reproduce with latest trunk builds on Win2k & XP.
WFM?
-> WFM
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•