Closed
Bug 599632
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
[Fennec] SecurityUI reinitialized for the same window
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Core
Networking: HTTP
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
fennec | 2.0b2+ | --- |
People
(Reporter: mayhemer, Assigned: mayhemer)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.42 KB,
patch
|
mayhemer
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In Fennec desktop build I don't get this notification in nsSecureBrowserUI::OnStateChange after the initial load of a page. After reload the notification is obtained. This is probably happening because the top level channel is not being removed from its load group.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•13 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: --- → ?
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
The problem is in a different place. We apparently load an about:blank URI for a window, then start loading a page, after we start, we create a new instance of SecurityUI for that window, while throwing away the old instance. The new instance is an invalid internal state. Going to investigate further.
Summary: [Fennec] Missing STATE_STOP status notification for LOAD_DOCUMENT_URI channels → [Fennec] SecurityUI reinitialized for the same window
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Removing initiation of security ui from browser.js. Security UI for the docshell is initiated properly in nsWebBrowser::Create() [1]. This code [2] is called twice and too late, after we start load of the document. I assume this bug is more complex. This patch is just a quick fix for a blocking bug. [1] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/annotate/4d2eff8cc112/embedding/browser/webBrowser/nsWebBrowser.cpp#l1138 [2] http://hg.mozilla.org/mobile-browser/annotate/5807503f22d8/chrome/content/bindings/browser.xml#l61
Assignee: nobody → honzab.moz
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #481542 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Updated•13 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: ? → 2.0b2+
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 481542 [details] [diff] [review] v1 How does the securityUI get initialized at all?
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Oh, you're saying that we need to remove this code and apply the patch in bug 575950?
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 481542 [details] [diff] [review] v1 Since we are removing everything in the receiveMessage method we can remove receiveMessage() and init() and not call SecurityUI.init() anymore
Attachment #481542 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > Comment on attachment 481542 [details] [diff] [review] > v1 > > How does the securityUI get initialized at all? See comment 2. (In reply to comment #4) > Oh, you're saying that we need to remove this code and apply the patch in bug > 575950? Exactly. This fixes the problem with the security bar info not filled after the first load of a page. (In reply to comment #5) > Comment on attachment 481542 [details] [diff] [review] > v1 > > Since we are removing everything in the receiveMessage method we can remove > receiveMessage() and init() and not call SecurityUI.init() anymore I was thinking of it too, just needed to get it confirmed. I'll address your comments.
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #481542 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #482281 -
Flags: review+
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
code has landed so marking fixed. bug 575950 still needs to land
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•