We seem to be having problems with enforcing wrapping in certain fixed table layout situations as seen on this web page. A reduced test case can be found below.
This will probably get fixed with the patch for bug 59252 which Chris plans on checking in today. Also, I want to note that in your testcase that the given widths for the top level table has different specified widths (368, 386). May just be a typo for width. Marking it as a dup of bug 59252, since it behaves the same way as in its testcases (overflowing content in fixed layout tables). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 59252 ***
Testcase looks good in build 2000-11-18-08-trunk on Windows 98 SE. VERIFIED DUPLICATE.