Closed Bug 600617 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

test case - themes landing page sorts

Categories

(Testing Graveyard :: WebQA, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: tsmith, Assigned: mozwebqa)

Details

Attachments

(4 files, 4 obsolete files)

separate test case for each page. The Ratings sort is not included.
Attached file test sort option Created (obsolete) —
Attached file test sort option Name (obsolete) —
Attached file test sort option Popular/Downloads (obsolete) —
Attached file test sort option Updated (obsolete) —
Assignee: nobody → mozwebqa
Attachment #479460 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479460 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479461 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479461 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479462 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479462 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479465 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479465 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
(In reply to comment #0) > separate test case for each page. The Ratings sort is not included. Supporting modules (page classes, utilities) in bug 599537
Attachment #479460 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #479460 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479460 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attached file test sort option Name
Attachment #479461 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #479461 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479461 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479462 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #479462 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479462 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #479465 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #479465 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #479465 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Summary: test case - themes home page sorts → test case - themes landing page sorts
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(tgavankar)
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Comment on attachment 480719 [details] test sort option Created put the themes_checked += 1 at the bottom of the loop so that it increments after the check actually occurs. other than that looks ok. one question: is there ever a time when themes_landing.get_theme_added_date_as_date() may return None? Because if there's an issue on the site where the dates are just not being displayed (or something where it would return None), the previous_date would keep getting defined to None, which would result in no exceptions being caught/saved (and so we wouldn't know anything's wrong).
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(tgavankar) → review+
(In reply to comment #10) > Comment on attachment 480719 [details] > test sort option Created > > put the themes_checked += 1 at the bottom of the loop so that it increments > after the check actually occurs. > > other than that looks ok. > > one question: is there ever a time when > themes_landing.get_theme_added_date_as_date() may return None? Because if > there's an issue on the site where the dates are just not being displayed (or > something where it would return None), the previous_date would keep getting > defined to None, which would result in no exceptions being caught/saved (and so > we wouldn't know anything's wrong). themes_landing.get_theme_added_date_as_date() should not return a None, in theory. get_text should try to return some text and find_long_date should try to return a date type, and when they can't they should return an exception.
ok as long as an exception is thrown somewhere, that's fine
Comment on attachment 480720 [details] test sort option Name looks ok
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(tgavankar) → review+
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(tgavankar) → review+
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(tgavankar) → review+
commit r75396
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480722 - Flags: review+
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480721 - Flags: review+
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480720 - Flags: review+
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(vish.mozilla)
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review?(mozbugs.retornam)
Attachment #480719 - Flags: review+
Product: Testing → Testing Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: