Closed
Bug 60281
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
[greeamozilla-installer: Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x1ee5)!
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Future
People
(Reporter: greearb, Assigned: slogan)
Details
[greear@grok mozilla-installer]$ ./mozilla-installer
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x1ee5)!
Installer is busted it seems. Gets started downloading (though never
shows progress bars, and doesn't update 1/6 package info..it seems to
download a few packages before blowing up with the above error.)
This is from the 'latest nightly build', as of Wed 15, 2000
Keep up the good work,
Ben
Updated•25 years ago
|
QA Contact: gemal → gbush
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
Linux distribution vendor?
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Per Ben Greear:
Redhat 6.2, but with a fairly recent version of GNOME installed. It was very
re-producible.
Comment 4•25 years ago
|
||
GNOME version?
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
I am seeing this with builds for 11/27 and 11/28 also
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
installation is a problem when doing from remote login.
I can successfully install on the machine itself
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Grace,
When did this first start? (We have not changed the Linux installer code since
N6 RTM. Have you changed the way you remote display?)
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
This started 11/27....I have the trunk builds from 11/14 that installed as
usual- up through 11/21
I have not changed anything - on purpose that is
I have access to machine in lab for CD testing and tried the 11/27 and on builds
there and they install successfully (and run from my remote machine once
installed)
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
I always used the installer builds, last one that worked for me was a 2-5 build.
Now, with a build from the 2001-02-06-21-Mtrunk directory, I get this error. As
far as I can remember, I did not change my configuration.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Nothing changed on our end with the installer code base either. Does the 02-05
build still work for you? (Trying to determine if anything may have changed on
your end in the last two days.)
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
No problem installing todays build (2001020808 linux).
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
is this related to bug 76224?
tinus: what steps did you take to attempt to reproduce this issue?
Would someone please follow the bug reporting guidelines and provide steps to
reproduce? Thanks.
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
As this happened three months ago, I do not remember exactly what happened. The
steps to reproduce were like this:
- Try to install mozilla using the installer build
- See it fail with the 'unexpected async reply' message.
As simple as that. I did not do anything strange, there are little choices to
make in the installer, it just didn't work.
The bug I reported was probably fixed, as I haven't had any problems since. I am
not sure if it was the same problem as what this bug is about, but since it
looked quite similar to what I had been experiencing, I appended my report to
this bug instead of filing another duplicate.
It might have been better to describe exactly what I did and what happened, but
that's hard to do when there is so little to describe. I apologize if I confused
you.
I think the other people who have reported that they have reproduced the bug
should be contacted to retry with a recent build. I expect there will be little
problems, as otherwise this would probably have been a MOSTFREQ bug.
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
I just had this problem. Red Hat 7.0 beta (wolverine) with glibc-2.2.2-9.i386.
mozilla-installer apparently downloads all the packages, but then dies with
this error:
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x29d3)!
Gdk-ERROR **: X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Syd,
Can you take a look at this? Looks very similar to bug 69734. Thanks.
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
@Reporter
Does this bug exists in newer builds? If not, then please close the bug as
WorksForMe else let us know.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
As far as I know, this is fixed. I have done several installs
lately with no problem on RedHat 9 + updates.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•