Closed Bug 602993 Opened 14 years ago Closed 14 years ago

give SDK documentation the overall look and feel of Add-on Builder

Categories

(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect)

Product:
Add-on SDK Graveyard
Component:
General
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: myk, Assigned: wbamberg)

Details

The SDK's documentation currently looks quite spartan, and it isn't clear that the SDK is related to Add-on Builder (or Mozilla generally). We'd like to highlight those relationships, for which it would be useful if the overall look and feel of the SDK's documentation (i.e. the web pages generated by the |cfx docs| command) was similar to that of Add-on Builder. Atul: you mentioned an interest in taking this on. Can you tackle it?
Sure, I can bust it up.
Assignee: nobody → avarma
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Note that the Add-on Builder currently has a bug to make it look more like AMO, so we should consider that before we make the SDK look more like the Add-on Builder.
Urgh, I don't really have the bandwidth to tackle this right now, so I'm unassigning it from myself. If anyone else is interested in working on this, feel free!
Assignee: avarma → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Assignee: nobody → wbamberg
The Add-on SDK is no longer a Mozilla Labs experiment and has become a big enough project to warrant its own Bugzilla product, so the "Add-on SDK" product has been created for it, and I am moving its bugs to that product. To filter bugmail related to this change, filter on the word "looptid".
Component: Jetpack SDK → General
Product: Mozilla Labs → Add-on SDK
QA Contact: jetpack-sdk → general
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Fixed by the fix for bug 619707 https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/708f4c7bb2c6282c26fcd35f98d3d1ae31ef38c2
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.