Closed
Bug 603766
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
cert9 (SQL) format databases don't report SEC_ERROR_BAD_DATABASE
Categories
(NSS :: Libraries, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 495097
People
(Reporter: chris.newman, Unassigned)
Details
For cert8 format databases, if the databases don't exist, the error code is SEC_ERROR_BAD_DATABASE. This allows products to identify an un-configured database and suppress diagnostics. However, for an upcoming version of the product on which I work we're using the cert9 format (adding "sql:" prefix to path) by default. If the databases doesn't exist, I'm seeing SEC_ERROR_INVALID_ARGS (-8187) instead of SEC_ERROR_BAD_DATABASE (-8174). This would be an incompatible interface change. See bug 273624 for additional information.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
So I need to code a workaround for this bug so it stops causing problems for our testing. My plan is to stat() cert9.db prior to trying to initialize NSS. If I get ENOENT from the stat, I'll force the error code to SEC_ERROR_BAD_DATABASE in my error callback. I know this violates the "private interface" rule about cert9.db, but I can't think of an alternative. Any other suggestions for a workaround?
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Chris, Is it correct to assume that the function that sets a different error code with cert9 is NSS_Init* ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Yes, our code only uses NSS_Initialize to initialize NSS.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Chris: thanks for the bug report. You are most likely running into bug 495097. Are you using NSS 3.12.x, where x < 4, on a 64-bit OS?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Yes, I had let the version of NSS on my 64-bit development machine get out of date (3.12.3). It does appear bug 495097 is the culprit. I'm marking as duplicate and removing workaround code. Apologies for the mistake on my part and thank you for the assistance.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Chris, We can search for dups. It's better to open a bug and have it closed a dup than to not open a bug that becomes an even bigger issue later. Thanks for taking the time to write this bug. bob
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•