Closed
Bug 60399
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Save as Charset: html body is not saved to iso-2022-jp as specified.
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
mozilla0.9.2
People
(Reporter: ji, Assigned: tetsuroy)
Details
(Keywords: intl)
***observed with linux 2000-11-08-07 ja build****
When Saving a document to iso-200-jp by selecting File | Save as Charset, it
actually is not saved in the charset as expected.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Launch Composer.
2. Enter some Japanese and select File | Save as Charset. Be sure that the
charset on the Composer is not set to ISO-2022-JP
3. Save the file into html format.
4. Open the file with an editor.
You'll see that although the document has a meta tag of ISo-2022-JP, but the
body part is actually in EUC.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Linux only? I cannot reproduce with 6.0 with Windows 2000 en-US.
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
I cannot reproduce this with 11-08 MN6 JA and US build on Redhat 6.2JA.
More info:
After you select File | Save as Charset, a dialog window comes up.
On this window, if you select ISO-2022-JP first and then enter a title for the
document, the html page can be saved correctly in ISO-2022-JP.
However, if you enter a title first, and then select ISO-2022-JP, you won't get
the composer contents saved in ISO-2022-JP.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
composer problem. Reassign to yokoyama.
Mark this as moz 0.9.1 P3.
Put nsbeta1 into the keyword.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
Is this a duplicate of 56200? ylong, please verify.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
I have a new comments for bug 56200, so I can't tell if it is dupilicated of
that. However, seems I didn't see this on 01-17 Mtrunk Linux build.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Linux specific. Please see if you can fix it.
Assignee: yokoyama → bstell
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
in EditorSaveAsCharset.js line 93 it checks that the charset has been changed
before setting the metacharset.
Frank, could you look at this?
Updated•24 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.1 → mozilla0.9.2
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Juraj, would you please look at this?
thanks
Assignee: bstell → jbetak
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.2 → ---
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
looks pretty bad. reassign to yokoyama.
yokoyama, please help to look at this one. try to reproduce this on ji's unix
machine.
mark it as moz0.9.2 for now.
Assignee: jbetak → yokoyama
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.2
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
Retested with 06-11-08-mtrunk build. The problem doesn't exist anymore.
Resolved it as wfm.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
I can not reproduce it on 08-24 Linux trunk build. Mark it as verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•