Open Bug 611532 Opened 14 years ago Updated 2 years ago

"ASSERTION: We should have padding here! (out of memory?)"

Categories

(Core :: XUL, defect)

defect

Tracking

()

Tracking Status
blocking2.0 --- -

People

(Reporter: jruderman, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Keywords: assertion, testcase)

Attachments

(2 files)

Attached file testcase
###!!! ASSERTION: We should have padding here! (out of memory?): 'hasPadding', file layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp, line 693
I don't know why bug 550325 was a blocker, but this might need to be a blocker for the same reason.
blocking2.0: --- → ?
I don't know either.
blocking2.0: ? → -
I guess bug 550325 was a blocker because it's pure HTML+CSS and there
was an actual layout error involved, so it could potentially have broken
some site.

This bug (which is the padding variant of bug 586628) involves XUL boxes
in HTML and it's just a harmless assertion - no layout regression.
I think we should just mute these assertions for XUL boxes until
we actually implement percentage padding/margin for them.
Blocks: 586628
Severity: normal → minor
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Attached patch fixSplinter Review
Assignee: nobody → matspal
Whiteboard: [post-2.0]
Noting here that attachment 508920 [details] [diff] [review] should be backed out when this bug is fixed.
Only happens for XUL frames.
Assignee: mats → nobody
Component: Layout → XUL
Whiteboard: [post-2.0]
Still affects Windows at least (other platforms don't seem to reproduce easily on Try anyway).
Severity: minor → S4
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: