Closed
Bug 614983
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
In the updated add-on manager, icons for disabled add-ons are missing
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect)
Toolkit
Add-ons Manager
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
DUPLICATE
of bug 611241
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | betaN+ |
People
(Reporter: sdrocking, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [needs 611241])
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101126 Firefox/4.0b8pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101126 Firefox/4.0b8pre
This is perhaps not intended and must be fixed.
Reproducible: Always
![]() |
||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Component: General → Add-ons Manager
OS: Windows 7 → All
Product: Firefox → Toolkit
QA Contact: general → add-ons.manager
Hardware: x86 → All
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Good catch. Thanks! Regressed between b6 and b7.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regression
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Known regression from bug 601022 - its caused by bug 611241.
Guess we can keep this open so we don't lose track of it.
Depends on: 611241
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Er, to clarify: the icons are there, and they're meant to be displayed in gray-scale. However, due to a bug in SVG filters, you can't see them.
And bug 611241 is already a blocker.
blocking2.0: ? → ---
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
This is still a blocker, if for some reason bug 611241 can't be fixed then we still need to fix this.
blocking2.0: --- → betaN+
Whiteboard: [needs 611241]
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is still a blocker, if for some reason bug 611241 can't be fixed then we
> still need to fix this.
What would the non-svg filter work-around look like?
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> What would the non-svg filter work-around look like?
The only other way I can think of keeping the grayscale effect would be to copy the image into a canvas element, and desaturate it there.
An a last fallback, we could just make the image slightly transparent. Doesn't look as good (or as noticable) as grayscale though.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Dao asserts this is a dup of bug 611241
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•