Closed
Bug 617140
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Define source code license list for demo room
Categories
(developer.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Demo Studio / Dev Derby, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
0.9.4
People
(Reporter: jay, Unassigned)
Details
We need to figure out which licenses we want to enable contributors to share their code under.
We want to support Github for sure, possible Bitbucket, which both should have their own list of licenses their users can apply. What others do we want to enable for our demos?
An important feature to the demo room is the ability to download and hack on source code, as well as view and learn from it... so we need to make sure our users agree to abide by the licenses attached to the demos.
But what should that list be?
| Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 0.9.4
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
CC-BY-SA Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 [DEFAULT]
CC-BY Createive Commons Attribution 3.0
CC-BY-NO Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0
CC-BY-NO-SA Createive Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0
MPL/GPL/LGPL
GPL
LGPL
BSD
Apache
AGPL
CC-BY-ND Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDervis
CC-BY-NO-ND Creative Commons Attribution-NoDervis
Do What The Fuck You Want To Public License (WTFPL)
Public Domain
Other (N/A)
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
It looks like github and bitbucket don't have license as project metadata.
Usually projects include a LICENSE file or mention the license in the README.
I think it's cool to promote the license as metadata to raise developer awareness around the issues.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
CC'ing malexis so he can review the list with legal.
Thanks Ozten for the list. It looks pretty exhaustive to me. And I think the default CC is probably the best for the demos.
If that list works for legal, we should just put together the necessary language in our terms of service to cover how we expect users to accept and abide by the licenses associated with demos on the site.
If they suggest we use a subset of those, I think we'll be fine as well... as long as we cover the licenses most commonly used by web developers.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
calling this closed
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Version: MDN → unspecified
| Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: Demos → Demo Studio / Dev Derby
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: developer.mozilla.org → developer.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•