Closed
Bug 618171
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
offer to associate a bug to a failed test result
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: MozTrap, enhancement, P1)
Mozilla QA Graveyard
MozTrap
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
0.5
People
(Reporter: aakashd, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [API?])
Attachments
(1 file)
161.73 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
When a user select "failed" as the result of a testcase, a "add a bug" user interface should pop-down below the test case. In there, users should be able to add: * The id of a new bug * Select an already filed bug for the testcase version To add a new bug, the "add" button should be clicked. After the click, an id entered and submit button should show. After the id is entered, the submit button will request the title of the bug and those fields will be added to bugs associated to the test result.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Ok, so we'll need this capability added to the API, it isn't currently there.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [API?]
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
A Pivotal Tracker story has been created for this Bug: http://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/12752431
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: api bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656710
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: platform bug resolved. so this should be cleared now.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Target Milestone: 0.4 → 0.5
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Eric Meyer changed story state to started in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: I think this is great. I also thing, though, that the bug items listed should be live URLs, (if they are in URL format) so that the user can nav to them to check if they're the one they intend. would you like a separate story for that?
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Jonny Gerig Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: Carl: When I assign a new bug, it shows up after ajax-reload. But when I assign an existing bug, it doesn't show up. Shouldn't it?
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: jonny: yes it should, but it doesn't at the moment due to this platform issue: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/19109777
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer changed story state to finished in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer changed story state to delivered in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: Not sure who this belongs to: if I had entered some NON url text for the url of the bug (like just a bug number) it still treats it as a URL. However, it looks like it just appends that to a CC URL. I entered: 23425323 the url it ended up with was: https://cc-dev.oddsites.net/run/4/23425323 Could we check if the value is a valid URL? If not, just make it static text?
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson changed story state to rejected in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer changed story state to started in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: eric: this needs some styling help now that bugs are not necessarily links. see bugs/bug.html if you need to make markup changes; note that the radio-button-list in _run_case.html doesn't use that template.
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Eric Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: cam: I'm wondering about this as a UI choice. Why do we want to allow non-URL bugs?
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
Eric Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: carl: we're dropping support for non-urls. the input is already a url input, so it should HTML5-validate as such. not sure why it isn't. back to you.
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: @j this is in 0.5.X-runtests-form
Comment 18•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: I know it doesn't seem related to this bug, but the URL-validation stuff here is actually why I'm doing it, so it is.
Comment 19•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer added a comment in Pivotal Tracker: @j - on that branch, the server-side now also validates required fields and returns errors as messages, more like other parts of the site. So all that JS custom validation isn't needed anymore (it's kinda broken anyway, repeated errors show up multiple times and never disappear). HTML5 form validation (which will now work) is enough to have on the client-side, if they don't have a new enough browser for that they'll just get it in messages.
Comment 20•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer changed story state to finished in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 21•13 years ago
|
||
Carl Meyer changed story state to delivered in Pivotal Tracker
Comment 22•13 years ago
|
||
Cameron Dawson changed story state to accepted in Pivotal Tracker
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•