Closed
Bug 624440
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Fully fix onComposerFromChanged() after bug 337964
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, defect)
Thunderbird
Message Compose Window
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: sgautherie)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
1.87 KB,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I filed (SM port) bug 624432,
but I'm puzzled by the "changed" case(s) of bug 337964 fix.
I'm confused by the vars being named 'g*OptionChanged' (which seems correct to me) versus the comments about 'manually checked' [Couldn't the case be "manually unchecked" too?]
Shouldn't useEncryption/useSigning value be explicitly set in !=/!signMessage cases too?
Shouldn't gEncryptOptionChanged and gSignOptionChanged be reset to false in some case(s)?
If the code is correct as is, maybe just modifying/adding some more comments would clarify it.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #502544 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #502544 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #502545 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Attachment #502544 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0)
> I'm confused by the vars being named 'g*OptionChanged' (which seems correct to
> me) versus the comments about 'manually checked' [Couldn't the case be
> "manually unchecked" too?]
The code comments "checked" is really implying checked/unckeckecked.
> Shouldn't useEncryption/useSigning value be explicitly set in !=/!signMessage
> cases too?
Matter of taste i guess. This way it's the least amount of code.
> Shouldn't gEncryptOptionChanged and gSignOptionChanged be reset to false in
> some case(s)?
I suppose one could, but i don't really they should ever reset. If they changed the user made a conscious choise.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 502545 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1a) Do not abuse boolean vars with string values
[Checked in: Comment 5]
Ok with me.
Attachment #502545 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 502545 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1a) Do not abuse boolean vars with string values
[Checked in: Comment 5]
http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/57a01a6867f8
Attachment #502545 -
Attachment description: (Av1a) Do not abuse boolean vars with string values → (Av1a) Do not abuse boolean vars with string values
[Checked in: Comment 5]
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sgautherie.bz
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•