Closed
Bug 626109
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Thumbnails should be ordered vertically if the group is higher than wide / Thumbnails should be as large as possible
Categories
(Firefox Graveyard :: Panorama, defect, P4)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 595224
Future
People
(Reporter: andreasjunghw, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b10pre) Gecko/20110114 Firefox/4.0b10pre
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0b10pre) Gecko/20110114 Firefox/4.0b10pre
At the moment TabCandy always tries to order tab thumbnails horizontally.
But if the group that contains the tabs is higher than wide it would be advantageous to order the tabs vertically, because they would be displayed bigger then and therefore easier to recognize.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new tab group
2. Resize the tab group so that its (much) higher than wide
3. Open a few tabs in the group
Actual Results:
TabCandy orders the thumbnails horizontally and wastes space / leaves space unused.
┌--------------┐
|┌-----┐┌-----┐|
|| 1 || 2 ||
|| || ||
|└-----┘└-----┘|
|┌-----┐ |
|| 3 | |
|| | |
|└-----┘ |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
└--------------┘
Expected Results:
TabCandy should display the thumbnails as big as possible / order them vertically in this case.
┌--------------┐
|┌-------┐ |
|| | |
|| 1 | |
|| | |
|└-------┘ |
|┌-------┐ |
|| | |
|| 2 | |
|| | |
|└-------┘ |
|┌-------┐ |
|| | |
|| 3 | |
|| | |
|└-------┘ |
└--------------┘
Updated•15 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Priority: -- → P4
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
This is a dupe of bug 595224, which is a wontfix. :( We tried some patches out as experiments (available on that bug, though they won't apply cleanly any more), but we felt the dynamic resizing of whitespace that would be required to keep this up was a little odd. I made a comment on that bug, though, which when I read now is not a full sentence:
> That says, if someone has a brilliant patch which does this in a smoother,
nicer fashion.
Clearly I meant, if that's the case, we would consider it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → Firefox Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•