629385 - Print previewing an email with an attachment requires user to have to open it twice

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 529210

(MailNews Core :: Networking: IMAP, defect)

Description

[Ian Neal]

Steps to reproduce.
1/ Connect to an IMAP mail server.
2/ Select a message with a word or excel attachment.
3/ Select print preview.
4/ Progress dialog comes up.

Expected result.
1/ Print preview window opens.

Actual result.
1/ Stays stuck on progress dialog window.

Workaround
1/ Close progress dialog window.
2/ Select print preview.
3/ Progress dialog opens.
4/ Dialog closes and preview window opens.

Comment 1

[rsx11m]

Ian, which SM version are you using? This seems to be bug 529210 which was fixed by bug 565852 and should be visible on trunk or the 2.0.12 candidates.

Comment 2

[Ian Neal]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Ian, which SM version are you using? This seems to be bug 529210 which was
> fixed by bug 565852 and should be visible on trunk or the 2.0.12 candidates.

Hmmm, I did search but didn't hit the right combination of words obviously. The 400+ users all have 2.0.11, so once 2.0.12 is out I'll confirm that this is fixed and mark this bug as a dupe.

Comment 3

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

(In reply to Ian Neal from comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Ian, which SM version are you using? This seems to be bug 529210 which was
> > fixed by bug 565852 and should be visible on trunk or the 2.0.12 candidates.
> 
> Hmmm, I did search but didn't hit the right combination of words obviously.
> The 400+ users all have 2.0.11, so once 2.0.12 is out I'll confirm that this
> is fixed and mark this bug as a dupe.

Ian, all better now? :)

Comment 4

[rsx11m]

Caching of attachments is still broken for IMAP without synchronization enabled due to bug 629738, but should cause only unnecessary re-fetching rather than a hang.

Comment 5

[Thomas D. (:thomas8)]

(In reply to rsx11m from comment #4)
> Caching of attachments is still broken for IMAP without synchronization
> enabled due to bug 629738, but should cause only unnecessary re-fetching
> rather than a hang.

I read that and the history of this bug as saying that it's a duplicate of bug 529210 which was fixed at the time. STR aren't complete.