109.04 KB, text/x-po
Hi Vito; mind taking a look at this? Thanks!
The question marks have miracously changed into periods; the statement should instead of lambda n: int((n%100==1. 0 : n%100==2. 1 : n%100==3 or n%100==4. 2 : 3)) read like lambda n: int((n%100==1 ? 0 : n%100==2 ? 1 : n%100==3 or n%100==4 ? 2 : 3)) I am attaching the correct messages.po file - there was already trouble once with this same sentence. I have evidently corrected it to the worse. Sorry for extra work! I will also upload a changed file into Verbatim, so that it will come down the pipeline without this error. Regards Vito
Created attachment 511945 [details] messages.po with a corrected "plural-Forms" sentence here's the messages.po file, corrected for the "period-instead-of-?" error: "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" ""Plural-Forms: nplurals=4; plural=(n%100==1 ? 0 : n%100==2 ? 1 : n%100==3 || n%100==4 ? 2 : 3);\n"" "X-Generator: Pootle 2.1.5\n"
Vito, Kadir, can we please get this fixed today before our release?
Oops, did not mean to resolve.
Hey Vito, was there an issue with checking-in into Verbatim? I'll need to do that now on my end, since we are pushing the new version today. I hope that it doesn't break anything with your tools. But let me know please if it does, and we can talk about how to avoid that in the future.
Now we're getting "ValueError: plural forms expression error, maybe unbalanced parenthesis" errors again.
fixed, hopefully: r82649
Verified FIXED on https://support.allizom.org/sl/jsi18n/