Closed
Bug 63462
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Mousewheel requires click to scroll
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Widget: Mac, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Future
People
(Reporter: mikepinkerton, Assigned: jaas)
References
Details
(Keywords: embed)
right now, the area you want to scroll with the mousewheel needs focus. We have code that uses the mouse position, but it is upset by idle events sending fake mouseMoves. To play with it, do: #define USEMOUSEPOSITIONFORSCROLLWHEEL 1 in nsMacEventHandler.cpp. It works fine, except that we drop events (they go to the wrong widget) when the wheel moves very quickly. An idle event sneaks in and resets the mouse position until the wheel stops.
Reporter | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
I think requiring focus is desired behavior, actually -- so, for example, you can scroll e-mail while hovering the mouse over the Delete button. It's only a noticable problem because of the wrong things having focus by default -- bug 9086, bug 37638, and so on. If the behavior requested by this bug was implemented, mousewheel scrolling would leave you marooned in a multiline text field if the field happened to pass under the cursor as you scrolled the page.
Being that it seems like all but the Kensington scrolling mouse issues have been solved, is this one of them, pink? Can we close it out? On the other hand, here's a thought: is there a time when you'd rather scroll a text box instead of the main page with the scrolling wheel? i don't think so...In my opinion, it would be better to assign the scrolling to apply to the main page only...and the rest can be done manually. Or, better yet, make it yet another Pref Panel:). -d.
As i've commented elsewhere scrolling of inner objects including textboxes is important. [You can write a 10 paragraph bug comment and want to use scrolling]. However, i think we'll leave those problems to be addressed by other bugs.
I guess the real question comes down to: Do we want to a) offer scrolling for the page without having to click inside the frame [i.e. scrolling will not be disabled by typing into the URL box, for example], or b) offer scrolling wherever the focus is, at the sacrifice of easy scrolling? Am I understanding this incorrectly? If so, my apologies...but I'm for the "lazy" solution-I'd rather be able to scroll the web page at all times, since I can't find a time where scrolling a small text box is that important to me. Perhaps a check to see if the item that has focus is scrollable? If not, then it should default to the main page...i.e. if the URL box has focus, you can still scroll.... Just some thoughts.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
requiring a click to focus goes against how the mousewheel works with all other mac apps. do i hear mpt actually arguing for something that doesn't work they way it does in the rest of the OS?
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Yes, because I think requiring a click to focus would be more than twice as usable as the platform convention (a convention which is probably dictated by the way in which current mousewheel software piggybacks native scrollbars, rather than by any UI considerations). Scrolling the wrong thing (or nothing) whenever you were hovering over a textfield, HTML SELECT popup menu, or toolbar would be considerably more annoying than having to click first in some cases (and fixing current focus bugs such as bug 9086 and bug 61299 will reduce the number of those cases) in order to scroll.
...which is precisely why I suggest that the scrolling default to the main frame unless the focus is somewhere else *that is scrollable*. Its a waste of "scrolling focus" (my terminology sucks here, I admit) to pay attention (in this respect) to something else that has focus if it can't scroll....no? On another note, I agree that sometimes having to guess what will scroll next is somewhat annoying, but that's easily fixed by moving the mouse a bit. Having to focus somewhere requires (arguably) more effort on my part. How's that for lazy? On an unrelated note, I'm taking this bug from jrgm. I know he'll love me for it.
QA Contact: jrgm → lorca
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
problem in, from the toolkit, we don't know what the "main frame" is, since that is a very navigator-specific concept -- this is a general purpose toolkit. or what about a page with multiple frames? Which is the main frame there?
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Hmmm. Good point. I'd suggest a larger area would be a more important frame, but not only would that be a nightmare, Id be incorrect 1/3 of the time. Grunt. So, um, how about the nearest scrollbar?:) On the other hand, I guess the distinction would come in handy when thinking of a "main frame" versus an "iframe." Thoughts?
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
What Dan Lorca said -- we shouldn't ignore the mousewheel just because focus is in a non-scrollable object like a text field. In that case, we should scroll the next scrollable parent (usually the main content area).
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Reassigning QA Contact for all open and unverified bugs previously under Lorca's care to Gerardo as per phone conversation this morning.
QA Contact: lorca → gerardok
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
i think we can live with this for the time being.
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → Future
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 69112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 138829 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 135500 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
This is not just a Mac problem. I have the same/worse problem on Linux. The problem is that I have a system-wide X-windows preference "focus-follows-mouse" and ALL other apps (including Netscape 3.79 BTW) react nicely to wheelmouse scrolling without a click when they get the cursor/focus. Mozilla 1.x and 0.99 don't behave this way. Worse. The don't really require click to focus, they seem to require holding the wheel down while scrolling it, which is a VERY strenous operation at least in my logitech wheel mouse. Please fix this bug. Preferably by leaving the window-manager preference alone rather than overriding it. Also, please verify that scrolling actually works when the mouse wheel is not pressed down _while_ scrolling it. Thanks!
Please leave this bug for the Mac problem, and get a separate bug filed for the Linux problem.
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
This bug is targeted at a Mac classic platform/OS, which is no longer supported by mozilla.org. Please re-target it to another platform/OS if this bug applies there as well or resolve this bug. I will resolve this bug as WONTFIX in four weeks if no action has been taken. To filter this and similar messages out, please filter for "mac_cla_reorg".
OS: Mac System 9.x → MacOS X
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
I'm using Mozillz 1.5 on Mac 10.2.6 with a logitech wireless optical mouse and a USB Overdrive driver for the mouse. I personally find the click to establish focus quite annoying (could live with it given Mozilla is the best browser out there for the Mac). I am used to scrolling being controlled by having the focus determine by the cursor location. There are a number of sites I use where there are large "inner windows" that are scrollable. Just my two cents.
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 228352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 230403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 23•21 years ago
|
||
Also seeing this with firebird on WinXP
Updated•19 years ago
|
Assignee: pinkerton → joshmoz
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: XP Toolkit/Widgets → Widget: Mac
QA Contact: gerardok → mac
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•19 years ago
|
||
This is not a problem any more as far as I can tell. We do not require focus, and we behave the same way Safari does.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•