I'd expect a webdev guide to cover a lot of the same ground that a guide/explanation on how and in what scope add-on code is run (see bug 633860 comment 7 and bug 577558 comment 10) would. Even if a webdev guide turns out to be mostly a duplication of other docs, I think it would be useful if only to give webdevs a springboard into documentation that might be particularly relevant to them.
(automatic reprioritization of 1.0 bugs)
Priority: P2 → P1
Target Milestone: 1.0 → 1.1
Drew: does https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/sdk/1.0/dev-guide/addon-development/two-types-of-scripts.html cover this well enough?
I think so, thanks Will.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.