Now a days about every 3 posting to news.mozilla.org is a spam. Something should be done about this. There's also a lot of empty postings that just have the "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" subject in it...
News issues -> firstname.lastname@example.org
Moving to nobody until we have better picture of where we'll be going with mozilla.org support by IC.
Recently the number of spam postings has become huge... I centain groups almost 75% of all postings are SPAM...
spam postings on news.mozilla.org has reached a level that's unacceptable
Help, My favorite news group is nothing but SPAM. Realy though, if you look at them, they may be coming from different sources, they are all have the same look. This must be from one specific source. Jeff.
one good antispam solution is http://www.brightmail.com
looking at the spam we get, it's not really alot of messages, the annoying point is that the few messages go to alot of groups. This is especially bad in low traffic groups, as you need to read the group, which you'd otherwise just skip over. Sounds like deleting spam by a set of topics should do it. I saw endico deleted a few by hand in bug 62228, could that be scripted? Axel
Spam is good. Lowering priority since I didn't want to see red.
Making this as a blocker because our newsgrops are so littered with crap that many people refuse to use them. This severely weakens our community and wastes the time of the brave souls who manage to use them anyway. To answer Axel's question. No, I can't script what I'm doing.
One idea I had is to have a newsgroup called "mozilla-spam", and everything that gets crossposted to it is deleted on all groups.
Perhaps we can call it "mozilla-weed", and call the process "smoking" :-) (Heck, Microsoft calls the downloading of a newsgroup "slurping"...)
We have a new server now so moving to Markus for comments.
*** Bug 112192 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This is getting out of hand. Since apparently we (finally!) have a new server, can we please do something about this. There are more spam posts than non spam ones. Possible solutions: a) Don't propogate the newgroups via usenet - require the use of n.m.o. Will cut down on usenet spam, not mailing list spam b) Require people who mail a list directly (ie not via usenet) to be subscribed to a mozilla list (any one, not necessarily the one they're sending to), or a dummy email@example.com list. Yes, this would be a pain, but the spam levels are getting unmanagable now. Does anyone know what % is mail vs usenet? BTW, what happened to the newsgroup reorg?
To be blunt, after-the-fact deletion is not really a solution for many people; those of us in the 21st century prefer push technology like mailing lists :) I'd strongly suggest shutting down the usenet interface. (and like bbaetz I'm very curious about the percentage of of non-spam posts that come in from the news interface as opposed to the mail interface.)
I, for one, enjoy living in the 20th century :) For me, it's much easier/more convient to read/post via the newsgroup because the e-mail address I uses most "forces" me to use Outlook as a client, and while Outlook does allow you to filter things into another folder when they arrive, it sucks for threading and it insists on always sending things in HTML (or even worse, Rich Text). Also, the company standard is that my name on outgoing mail is "JACOB STEENHAGEN" and I dislike sending to mailing lists that way (I much prefer the simple and proper case "Jake"). Having said that, there was a mailing list the I was on once that had the option once you subscribed that you could recieve no mail. You could then read/post using a newsgroup, but it would only accept postings from you if you were subscribed to the mailing list. I personally would not object to this type of solution [although there are probably others that would :( ]
Jake: that last solution sounds like a reasonable one if it's implementable.
Thats what I meant to say with my option (b). endico: Is doing something like this possible?
The spam level on netscape.public.mozilla.webtools is such that we have had some serious discussions about moving the Bugzilla discussion to a public mailing list that's not gatewayed to a news service. We're in the process of obtaining the bugzilla.org domain at the moment, which I'll have control over within the next week. The server that will be handling it has Majordomo2 on it, which issues passwords to each subscriber when they sign up that they can use for managing their subscription via the web interface. It would be trivial to write a web interface (which required the above password) to post messages, which would satisfy those like Jake that hate the way their work email clients send email. :) Although the mailing list archives aren't currently browsable via the web, it's on the feature list, and majordomo2 is still alpha, so it probably won't be long (the API is there, nobody's written a UI for it yet). But if something could be done about the spam on the mozilla mailing lists, I'd just as soon not take such drastic measures. :)
call me brave or shupid, I read all spam I could get on news.mozilla.org for one day. ALL came thru Path: secnews.netscape.com!gateway and not a single one came by nntp. Seems like a brutal mail spam solution on gila should get rid of most issues.
doh, he's right. I just took a look through everything that came in today, and none of it has "Newsgroups:" headers when viewed from the mailing list side, which means it originated on the mailing list side. Kill it at the mail gateway and we'll have most of this solved.
So, can this be done ASAP? If you don't want to restrict incomming mails, then all we need is a filter the incomming mail. I recommend razor - http://razor.sourceforge.net/. The only problem might be that we get the spam mail before anyone reports it as spam, so it would pass. This is unlikely to be effective on news postings, because they tend to have random text inserted to avoid these hash-based systems. If you're worried about false positives, or something, then just hook it up to add a header so that we can filter on it. Can something please be sone about this, though, at some point before the mythical new news server is used? Some groups have more spam than mail, and its totally useless.
Moving tickets to Ray.
even better than vipul's razor, which has some false positives, try SpamAssassin -- with the proper threshold, I have gotten *no* false positives, and only maybe 5% of spam makes it through on my (very forgiving) settings.
Why don't we close the mail gateway? Why do we possibly need both. The whole point of nntp is you don't need a mailing list. Alternatively, make the mailing list require subscription, AND make it use ordb.org. But I'd much rather see it eliminated. It currently breaks threads and other stuff, and mozilla and netscape default to sending html by mail, which is very taboo for nntp messages. Until then, I've been able to block 90% of spam with the following kill file. It's for slrn, but should be easily adaptable. I don't think the comments actually can go in the file, I just added them here for...commenting. # People that might post something interesting are exempted from the rest # of the rules (and highlighted, to boot) Score: =1000 From: @netscape\.com Score: =1000 From: @mozilla\.org Score: =1000 From: mpt@mailandnews\.com Score: =1000 From: bbaetz@cs\.mcgill\.ca Score: =1000 From: dbaron@fas\.harvard\.edu # these two post a lot of the crap, auto-kill them Score: =-9999 NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.108.40.206 Score: =-9999 NNTP-Posting-Host: 220.127.116.11 # auto mark these deleted, but still show them. I'm considering autokill here. Score: -9990 Content-Type: text/html Score: -9990 Content-Type: multipart/alternative # lots of japanese spam. Since I can't read it anyway, even if it was legit, # autokill it Score: =-9999 Content-Type:.*charset="Shift_JIS" Score: =-9999 Content-Type:.*charset=iso-2022-jpg # Hate to ban a whole country, but they had it coming. Tiwanese ISPs need to # crack down on spam. They're banned from the mail server at work too. Score: =-9999 From: \.tw$ # Cross posting is against the rules anyway. But only autodelete, still show, # just in case (unless it was HTML too, -9998 is the threshold) Score: -8000 Newsgroups: ,.*, # All caps = autokill Score: =-9999 ~Subject: \c[a-z] If any of that's really screwed up, got vote for the cant-paste-at-end-of-input bug, which made that take a lot longer then it should have.
/me has changed his email address No, the mail gateways are useful (although I wish we could convince people not to post html....) LAst weeks status update said that m.o was considering using the dcc - hopefully that should help.
News -> Markus
Have you ever thought of a cancelbot? At least for the most obvious spam and for the HTML messages.
FWIW, gila.mozilla.org is now blacklisted on bl.spamcop.net. http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=18.104.22.168 It's also blacklisted on outputs.orbz.org, but that's mothra's fault, and that's covered on bug 130841.
spamcop is listing gila because of it's news gateway which is probably throwing a lot of spams out. That is not mothra's fault AFAIK. I still don't understand why gila or ywing/xwing would be on any of open relays lists. mothra sends emails out directly nowadays - it's not using gila nor xwing/ywing as relays.
Right; this bug isn't about mothra. Gila on the spamcop list because all the preceeding Received: headers are stripped off, so it looks like gila is the originator of every message to the newsgroups, including the tons of spam. If the original headers were preserved, then gila wouldn't be the first server in the list, and so wouldn't get blamed. This should be done even after the spam filter is set up, since any filter won't be perfect.
Mass changing IC's ticket to reflect current situation. mozilla.org, AOL employees: If you want IC to look at issues reported in bugzilla, please open a Helpdesk ticket and ask it to be routed to AOL R1 Server Operations. We currently have no way to handle comprehensive problem resolution through bugzilla. This is not a change in the way we are supporting mozilla.org - we are still supporting you on the level as before. IC's support is based on Helpdesk ticket system - not bugzilla which only few hard-core people are looking at. Also, projects are handled elsewhere - not in bugzilla. If you have projects you need us to deliver please feel free to contact me directly. Summa summarum: tickets -> Helpdesk Project initiations -> RKotalampi@aol.com
Could someone at AOL/Mozilla/Netscape please open a Helpdesk iicket as Risto says. Tonite news.mozilla.org has just hit by a subscribing nitemare! Some guy just subscribed all the mail2news gateways to all kind of subscribtions lists (100+). We like to avoid this in the future!
*** Bug 127623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
adding self to cc list
Isnt this issue largly fixed by the new code on the mail->news gateways that only allows those that are on the mailing list to post to the mailing list?
this issue hasn't been fixed. Closing the mail -> news gateway is another bug. This bug is about hooking up the news.mozilla.org to some kind of anti spam program. So that the "usual" spam automaticlly gets deleted. A lot of spam companies sends out spam directly to the newsgroups.
*** Bug 224944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
The lists are being targeted again. Roughly 75% of postings in the past 4 days on mozilla lists I'm on have been spam. Are they from the same place? Any chance we can get a block on the sending site?
Who can change the configuration of the mailing lists, so that only mails from subscribed senders are accepted? In my opinion this would be an easy and effective solution of the problem. See comment #20. In the current state, the lists are not reasonably usable...
(In reply to comment #40) > Who can change the configuration of the mailing lists, so that only mails from > subscribed senders are accepted? The lists are already configured that way. All of the current spam is coming in through the usenet gateway, which is exempt from that rule because it would block all the legitimate posts as well. > See comment #20. Comment 20 was written 3 years ago, when we were on a different mailing list system that didn't have the "block nonsubscribers" option available.
Is comment 10 plausible? Most of the spam is cross-posted to most of the groups, so it would be quite effective.
(In reply to comment #14) > a) Don't propogate the newgroups via usenet - require the use of n.m.o. Will cut > down on usenet spam, not mailing list spam This is the option we've taken, and it seems to be working. There's been a couple slip through, but there's a hell of a lot more spam out there on the net in general now than there used to be, and the spam level on our groups in miniscule in comparison to how it used to be, so I'll consider this solved at the moment. There's still other things we can do probably, but we'll attack those as we come to them. Please file new bugs for specific issues if new problems arise.