647051 - repurpose rev2 minis as foopy{05...11}.b.m.o

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

These machines were set up in bug 635964, but never put into production.  They are now being re-purposed in bug XXXXXX.  They are already powered down because we are over capacity on the circuit in AFK (just blew a breaker).

moz2-darwin10-slave57
moz2-darwin10-slave58
moz2-darwin10-slave59
moz2-darwin10-slave60
moz2-darwin10-slave61
try-mac64-slave32
try-mac64-slave33
try-mac64-slave34
try-mac64-slave35
try-mac64-slave36

They should be adjusted appropriately in inventory, nagios, DNS, and whatever else is required.

Comment 1

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

The rev2 minis with the following asset tags (moz2-darwin10-slave{59-61}) are on clint's desk now - check with him to find the appropriate designation for them in inventory:

00797
00795
00794

Comment 2

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Could we turn

moz2-darwin10-slave57
moz2-darwin10-slave58
try-mac64-slave32
try-mac64-slave33
try-mac64-slave34
try-mac64-slave35
try-mac64-slave36

into foopy05 through foopy11, and get a base snow leopard install?
(Do you want a new bug?)

Comment 3

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Evidently these are all given to bmoss and we'll need a new solution for the foopies.

Comment 4

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

to put some asset-taggy goodness into this bug:

moz2-darwin10-slave59 
moz2-darwin10-slave60
moz2-darwin10-slave61
 are the three asset tags in comment 1 - 00797, 00795, and 00794.  I don't know which was which.

moz2-darwin10-slave57 - 0796
moz2-darwin10-slave58 - 0648
try-mac64-slave32 - 2280
try-mac64-slave33 - 00703
try-mac64-slave34 - 2345
try-mac64-slave35 - 00938
try-mac64-slave36 - 00941

From the sound of things on IRC, the above 7 machines were given to clint/bmoss, perhaps incorrectly.

Amy, can you mark these appropriately in inventory and catch Nagios, DNS, and DHCP up accordingly?

Comment 5

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

OK, the comment about the seven machines being given to clint was incorrect - I'm not sure where that came from.  Well, that it was from IRC should be a hint :)

So, amy -- for the moment, can you remove these minis and mark them spare?  Ping me in IRC so I can do the inventory part.

Aki, can you open a new bug for the new foopies, since it seems indeterminate whether you want to use rev2 minis (of which we now have 9 spare) or new hardware.

Comment 6

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

We already have bug 635907 for new foopies.

Comment 7

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Evidently these are all given to bmoss and we'll need a new solution for the
> foopies.
(In reply to comment #4)
> moz2-darwin10-slave57 - 0796
> moz2-darwin10-slave58 - 0648
> try-mac64-slave32 - 2280
> try-mac64-slave33 - 00703
> try-mac64-slave34 - 2345
> try-mac64-slave35 - 00938
> try-mac64-slave36 - 00941
> 
> From the sound of things on IRC, the above 7 machines were given to
> clint/bmoss, perhaps incorrectly.

Correction: These were not supposed to be given to bmoss/ctalbert, they were to be used as a set of identical foopies to share tegra load, and eliminate concerns of different foopy hardware having different SUTagent behavior. I found these 7 machines sitting unplugged in AFK. I've verified asset tag#s match machine names for all 7 machines. 

Zandr: I've put these 7 machines at your desk for reimaging with osx10.6. Please rename these as foopy(05...11}.b.m.o.



Open question: unknown what happened to moz2-darwin10-slave{59...61}? From emails with clint/bmoss, I believe the plan was to image moz2-darwin10-slave{59...61} as foopy{01,02,03), take the current rev1 foopies out of production, and recycle the rev1s for clint/ATeam work. Investigating... anyone know?

Comment 8

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Those went to mfinkle/blassey for mobile 50-android-phone-test-boxen work.

Comment 9

[Zandr Milewski [:zandr]]

"Reimaging with 10.6" is ambiguous.

Do you want a base install, the image I used for the machine for bmoss, or do you have another image, or ref machine?

Comment 10

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

For foopy05 through 11, Snow Leopard (just the OS).

Comment 11

[Zandr Milewski [:zandr]]

These are imaged, should I rack them up in MV, or do you want to work on them directly first.

Comment 12

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Imaged and on my desk.
These can't be administered remotely until we turn on remote desktop.

Comment 13

[Amy Rich [:arr] [:arich]]

Changes have been made in dns, dhcp, and inventory.  Please open a new ticket when you're ready to have the new foopies monitored via nagios.