Should we add libjpeg-turbo license to about:license?

RESOLVED INVALID

Status

()

Core
General
RESOLVED INVALID
7 years ago
7 years ago

People

(Reporter: m_kato, Unassigned)

Tracking

Trunk
Points:
---

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Reporter)

Description

7 years ago
As long as I know, libjpeg-turbo is wxWindows Library Licence, Version 3.1.  (Google Chrome shows as it in about:credits).  But there is no this notice into about:license.  Should we add libjpeg-turbo license to it?

Now there is only libjpeg license (This software is based in part on the work of the Independent JPEG Group.) in it.
As jlebar says, as far as I know we aren't using any WxWindows-licensed code. 

Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.