Closed
Bug 656912
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
The Mobile tree is called "mozilla-central-mobile-browser" in buildbot terms
Categories
(Tree Management Graveyard :: TBPL, defect)
Tree Management Graveyard
TBPL
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: mstange, Assigned: mstange)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
618 bytes,
patch
|
Swatinem
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
What was called "tree" in Tinderbox land is called "branch" in Buildbot land. Requesting run information from getRevisionBuilds.php happens with the combination of branch and revision. Currently, the Firefox and Mobile trees have the same primaryRepo and buildbotBranch, so they'd end up identical with the Buildbot backend.
Attachment #532217 -
Flags: review?(arpad.borsos)
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 532217 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 532217 [details] [diff] [review]: -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #532217 -
Flags: review?(arpad.borsos) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
OK, this patch isn't landable currently since it would break the self-serve functionality for mobile builds. The self-serve API seems to count all mobile builds to the mozilla-central buildbot branch.
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Per bug 656919 comment 3: it would be really awesome if we would have unique bb branches (separation between Firefox and Mobile)
Blocks: 656919
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
catlee: got an opinion about what we should do here? Since nobody ever looks at Mobile, we now have https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mobile which is just tree=Firefox, and https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mobile&usetinderbox=1 which is the actual totally unwatched Mobile, where self-serve doesn't work (did self-serve ever actually work for Maemo?). Should we just land this patch, make it show what it should and self-serve be damned?
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Oh, I can answer my own question, can't I? Since self-serve only knows about mozilla-central, the branch where the builds live, and not about a mobile or mozilla-central-mobile branch where Maemo tests might live, we *should* expect self-serve to not work.
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
It's more that the n900's run off a master which is standalone, rather than backed by the schedulerdb, but either way they're not part of self-serve. Aki knows the life expectancy of the n900s.
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Correct, https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mobile&usetinderbox=1 appears to only be N900s. The final supported release will be 7.0, which means they will be EOLed by 8.0 (sometime in November?)
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Ah, clarity begins to dawn. At some point, there must have been something in the buildbot json which claimed to be on the mozilla-central-mobile-browser branch, but now there isn't: all of Android and the Maemo builds are mozilla-central, and the Maemo tests don't exist in the buildbot json at all. Altered the Mobile tree's status so it would actually work with tbpl, and added a note saying that if you want to see the Maemo tests, the only point behind loading that tree, you should usetinderbox=1.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: Webtools → Tree Management
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: Tree Management → Tree Management Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•