Closed
Bug 658374
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Allow moving rev3 machines from production to staging/preproduction if it is needed
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task)
Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
CIDuty
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [preproduction])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.66 KB,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
It is not the first time that I have needed to move a slaves from production into staging because the staging were wedged or even try to use the slave#10 from preproduction. The problem I would face is that it would take me some time to notice that the slave was not being able to take jobs.
Attachment #533774 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
I thought we were getting rid of staging? And that development systems would use the same *_config.py as preproduction (which includes all slaves)?
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 533774 [details] [diff] [review] staging_cofig.py - allow all slaves Patch is fine, but I think Dustin is right in comment 1.
Attachment #533774 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Should we remove the staging files so we don't use them?
Summary: Allow moving rev3 machines from production to staging if it is needed → Allow moving rev3 machines from production to staging/preproduction if it is needed
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P2
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P3
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → P4
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
As much as I would love to get to this there's much assigned to me at the moment. Putting it into the future.
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: armenzg → nobody
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Do we still want to do away with staging? Does that mean we'd be relying on preproduction to test release changes?
Component: Release Engineering → Release Engineering: Machine Management
OS: Mac OS X → All
Priority: P4 → --
QA Contact: release → armenzg
Hardware: x86 → All
Whiteboard: [preproduction]
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
This was for the sake of being able to move a slave to preproduction and test that is good to be put back in production. What I do instead is to put them in my own testing master and then be happy about it when it takes jobs appropriately.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•