Closed
Bug 660030
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Update avmplusVersion.h
Categories
(Tamarin Graveyard :: Virtual Machine, defect, P4)
Tamarin Graveyard
Virtual Machine
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Q1 12 - Brannan
People
(Reporter: stejohns, Assigned: gchaney)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.84 KB,
patch
|
edwsmith
:
review+
lhansen
:
feedback+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the version numbers in avmplusVersion.h have gone hopelessly stale. Since we are planning on now issuing stable releases corresponding to each Flash release, let's update. Notes on the patch: -- the release for Flash Serrano is going to be declared "Tamarin 2.0"; thus the version for mainline tamarin-redux is 2.1 for now. -- AVMPLUS_MAJOR_DATE and AVMPLUS_MINOR_DATE are unused and (IMHO) misleading and redundant (more accurate information is kept via hg), thus I'm removing them -- internal security-only branches will have version numbers that track identically, but with a version-string that has a "sec" suffix, eg "2.1" -> public version "2.1 sec" -> 2.1 with not-yet-publicized security fixes
Attachment #535415 -
Flags: review?(edwsmith)
Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #535415 -
Flags: feedback?(lhansen)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #535415 -
Flags: feedback?(lhansen) → feedback+
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
changeset: 6355:ad0fbc01b9be user: Steven Johnson <stejohns@adobe.com> summary: Bug 660030 - Update avmplusVersion.h (r=pending) http://hg.mozilla.org/tamarin-redux/rev/ad0fbc01b9be
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 535415 [details] [diff] [review] Patch +10e6 for restarting tamarin versioning. If anza and possibly more dot releases will ship from the serrano (T2.0!) branch, then we should account for that in the TR mainline version. but no need to hold up the process.
Attachment #535415 -
Flags: review?(edwsmith) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > If anza and possibly more dot releases will ship from the serrano (T2.0!) > branch, then we should account for that in the TR mainline version. but no > need to hold up the process. agreed. simplest is probably to do a 2.0.x versioning scheme. but we can decide that later.
May as well account for the maintenance releases (e.g., Anza) now. The proposal would be: major.minor[.maintenance] [sec] Current plans would dictate these versions for the Runtime releases: Serrano = 2.1.0 sec Anza = 2.1.1 sec Brannan=2.2.0 sec
Assignee: nobody → gchaney
Flags: flashplayer-qrb+
Flags: flashplayer-injection-
Flags: flashplayer-bug-
Target Milestone: --- → Q4 11 - Anza
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
hmm. Why did I put this in the set for Bug 727403 and Bug 727402.
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(ah, I see; the regexp I used in Bug 727402 fired on a spot related to this ticket, since security-only repositories are handled specially, as described in comment 0.)
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Tamarin isn't maintained anymore. WONTFIX remaining bugs.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•