Closed
Bug 660330
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Invalid Focus Event Information
Categories
(Firefox :: Disability Access, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 546812
People
(Reporter: basiphobe, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.772.0 Safari/535.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110527 Firefox/7.0a1
The focus even that fires in the cookies list does not contain valid information.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Open the Tools -> Options dialog, navigate to Privacy, then to remove individual cookies, and press enter. Tab to the cookie list, and arrow. As you do, you get:
Actual Results:
OBJ_FOCUS Name="The following cookies are stored on your computer:" Value=[bstr=NULL] Role=outline item State=selected,focused,collapsed,focusable,selectable
Expected Results:
The name should, instead, be the text of the selected item.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Blocks: focuseventa11y
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
This is definitely confirmed. The individual entries get the name from the parent tree view, where they should instead get the name from the underlying cells.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Alex, re blocking bug 375743: I don't think this is related to the focus event itself, but rather, the tree view items actually inherit the name from the parent. The focus is firing on the correct item. It's just that the item's name is wrong.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Ah! I knew I'd seen this somewhere else.
Duplicate of bug 546812? If not a duplicate, it's definitely similar.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Alex, re blocking bug 375743: I don't think this is related to the focus
> event itself, but rather, the tree view items actually inherit the name from
> the parent. The focus is firing on the correct item. It's just that the
> item's name is wrong.
got it, thank you for the catch
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Ah! I knew I'd seen this somewhere else.
>
> Duplicate of bug 546812? If not a duplicate, it's definitely similar.
it is, thanks again!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•