steps to reproduce: 1. Load https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/editors/review/compact-menu-2?num=2 2. Notice that beta versions are also listed with 'This add-on version has not been reviewed' status. observed behavior: Some editors were mentioning that they'd like all add-on versions listed for the sake of completeness. Should this also include beta files?
Component: Public Pages → Admin/Editor Tools
QA Contact: web-ui → admin-tools
jorgev says that beta files should be left out.
Yes, they should be left out. More importantly, I ran into a related bug when reviewing this add-on: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/editors/review/invisiblehand?num=3 It had a version pending review and a newer beta version as well. The review page showed the beta as the version being reviewed, and when I submitted the review it actually approved the beta version instead of the one pending review. While this is rare, it should be taken into consideration.
Priority: -- → P2
Whiteboard: [required amo-editors]
Target Milestone: --- → 6.1.2
http://github.com/jbalogh/zamboni/commit/24adc31 Should fix both problems.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Newly submitted beta version is not listed in the editor reviews anymore. Verified at https://addons-next.allizom.org/en-US/editors/review/overlay-that-uses-the-inser?num=1 Older add-ons are not listing beta versions anymore. verified at https://addons-next.allizom.org/en-US/editors/review/compact-menu-2?num=2
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reclassifying editor bugs and changing to a new whiteboard flag. Spam, spam, spam, spam...
Whiteboard: [required amo-editors] → [ReviewTeam]
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.