671521 - Problems building NSS 3.12.3 with NSPR 4.7.5 on AIX 7.1 in 64-bit mode.

Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX

(NSPR :: NSPR, defect)

Description

[Veera]

Attachment: Build Log for NSS 3.12.3.1 on AIX 7.1

I am trying to build NSS 3.12.3.1 with NSPR 4.7.5 on AIX 7.1 in 64-bit mode.

I have followed these steps

1. Downloaded the source from 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/NSS_3_12_3_1_RTM/src/nss-3.12.3.1-with-nspr-4.7.5.tar.gz
2. Extracted them to /LDAP
3. gmake version is 3.80, 
    Compiler is IBM XL C/C++ 11.1.0.0
4. setenv BUILD_OPT 1
    setenv USE_64 1
5. >cd /LDAP/nss-3.12.3.1/mozilla/security/nss
6. >gmake nss_build_all >& nss_build_all.log


I get the following Duplicate symbol warnings in the creation of .so files

ld: 0711-224 WARNING: Duplicate symbol: .bcopy
ld: 0711-224 WARNING: Duplicate symbol: .memcpy
	The following duplicates were found:
 Symbol                    Source-File(Object) OR Import-File{Shared-object}
 ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------
 .bcopy                    {../../../../dist/AIX7.1_64_OPT.OBJ/lib/libnspr4.so}
    ** Duplicate **        moveeq.s(/usr/lib/libc.a[moveeq_64.o])
ld: 0711-224 WARNING: Duplicate symbol: .memcpy
 .memcpy                   {../../../../dist/AIX7.1_64_OPT.OBJ/lib/libnspr4.so}
    ** Duplicate **        moveeq.s(/usr/lib/libc.a[moveeq_64.o])


I should not get these Duplicate symbol warnings.

Suppose if I unset BUILD_OPT, then .memcpy duplicate symbol warning is gone. But still facing .bcopy duplicate symbol warning.
Please let us know how to eliminate these warnings.

Comment 1

[Julien Pierre]

Ashwani, did you ever resolve this problem ?

Comment 2

[Wan-Teh Chang]

This may be related to bug 200561. I think the command we used to
build libnspr4.so may be wrong:

/usr/bin/ld -brtl -bnortllib -bM:SRE -bnoentry -bexpall -blibpath:/usr/lib:/lib -binitfini::_PR_Fini -o libnspr4.so ./prvrsion.o io/./prfdcach.o ... md/unix/./uxwrap.o md/unix/./aix.o   -lodm -lcfg -lpthreads -ldl -lC_r -lC -lc_r -lm /usr/lib/libc.a

I suspect the problematic one is /usr/lib/libc.a. We should also
be able to omit -lC_r -lC.

Comment 3

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

The bug assignee didn't login in Bugzilla in the last 7 months, so the assignee is being reset.

Comment 4

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

In the process of migrating remaining bugs to the new severity system, the severity for this bug cannot be automatically determined. Please retriage this bug using the new severity system.

Comment 5

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

The severity field is not set for this bug.
:KaiE, could you have a look please?

For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.

Comment 6

[Kai Engert [:KaiE:]]

We no longer look at AIX